search for: functors

I think I may be missing a fundamental concept I hope someone can help me with. I have functions that won''t call other functions. Particularly after an Ajax request. In the following object the ajax request onComplete calls the ajaxFetched function successfully. ajaxFetched tries to call function2 but function2 does not execute. Any ideas or workarounds? thanks Kevin o =

...ype.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/adaptors/retype_return.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/bind.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/bind_return.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/class_slot.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/connection.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors/functor_trait.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors/functors.h > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors/macros > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors/macros/functor_trait.h.m4 > /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/functors/macros/me...

...td=c++11 -O0 -c In file included from fail.cpp:1: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../../include/c++/4.8/unordered_map:47: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../../include/c++/4.8/bits/hashtable.h:268:7: error: static_assert failed "Cache the hash code or make functors involved in hash code and bucket index computation default constructible" static_assert(__if_hash_not_cached< ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../../include/c++/4.8/bits/unordered_map.h:120:36: error: member 'iterator' found in...

...passes used in the LLILC JIT and it seems like the simplest thing is to make a copy of the SimpleCompiler functor into the LLILC code and then modify it for the phases I want to run. But I was wondering if this was the best approach. Do you expect different clients to create their own compiler functors or do you imagine that SimpleCompiler will be joined by more sophisticated siblings that are more configurable with respect to what's run phase wise? Initial PR of the copied code (prior to us starting to modify it) is here: https://github.com/dotnet/llilc/pull/685 Thanks, -R --------------...

Hi, someone can help me, I am ot able to find the way how to user Ajax.updaterto test if the request give some positive or negative result. I am able only to return the result inside a div. An example is appreciated. _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org

...ug in VS2k3 (VS7) through VS2k8 (VS9) (no clue if it has been fixed yet) that requires it to be there when the functor is being called through a const qualified interface, such as through stl containers. They state that a bug report has been filed, but regardless of if it is filled or not, in such functors you are 'supposed' to have a const there anyway. No clue what the standard actually says on this, but what they said makes sense...

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: > >> I had also tried that before, but let me clean it and do it again to >> give you just a debug build log (since the current log just contains >> errors anyway, seeing the whole build might be useful). So what is >> attached is from

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > OvermindDL1 a écrit : >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1

I've run into a use case where I'd like to use a mapped_iterator to iterator the 1st (or 2nd) items in a sequence of std::pairs. Does select1st/select2nd exist somewhere within LLVM or is there some equivalent? If not, I'll add it. -Dave

...apped_iterator to > iterator the 1st (or 2nd) items in a sequence of std::pairs. Does > select1st/select2nd exist somewhere within LLVM or is there some > equivalent? If not, I'll add it. Is this making the resultant loop simpler? C++ without lambda's isn't very friendly to functors, what is the before/after effect of doing this? -Chris

How do you calculate the percentage of data within 2SD, 3SD, 4SD, 5SD, and 6SD of the mean? I used the following link as the data I'm working with: nb10 <- read.table("http://www.adjoint-functors.net/su/web/314/R/NB10") if this helps answer my question. Can you please explain how to calculate the SD's? Please be specific in which part of the function changes when calculating the next SD up. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-to-Calcul...

When running cloud-init im getting the following error Cloud-init v. 0.7.9 running 'modules:config' at Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:07:26 +0000. Up 2597.52 seconds. Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, product-id, search-disabled-repos, subscription-manager This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register. Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile

Okay, so I have a homework projecr for R, and we had to input the following link as some sort of data: nb10 <- read.table("http://www.adjoint-functors.net/su/web/314/R/NB10"). Afterwards, we have to use fivenum(nb10) to find max, min, quantiles, and sd, but I'm okay with this. The next question is where I'm stuck. The question is as follows; Compare the median (use the quantiles or median(nb10$V1)) to the mean. I found the mean...

Hi all, hi Lang It's a little late to report issues for release_50, but I just found that thing while porting my JitFromScratch examples to 5.0. This is a really nifty detail, but (if I'm not mistaken) the function signature of RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::NotifyLoadedFtor is incorrect: $ grep -h -r -A 1 "using NotifyLoadedFtor"

When we were using MCJIT, I could do this: // Attach the event listener Context.EE->RegisterJITEventListener( LLILCJitEventListener::createLLILCJitEventListener( new LLILCJitEventWrapper(&Context))); The event listeners listened for when an object is emitted (NotifyObjectEmitted), and that’s when we’d go through and extract debug info from the ObjectFile. Now, I imagine

Hi, I am trying to build a binary of Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits. I am using mingw gcc version 4.5.1 (tdm64-1) which is a experimental version of 64 bits ming gcc. (http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/). I have successfully compiled boost 1.45 and Quantlib 1.0.1 with this gcc. And then when I tried to compile Rquantlib 0.3.5, it reports some error. The first error is like below.

When using ORC JIT, I'm having trouble with external function resolution (that is, of a function defined in the app, with C linkage). I add a declaration for the function to my IR, and when I use MCJIT, it finds it and all is well, But when I use ORC JIT (I *think* correctly, at least it closely matches what I see in the tutorial), I get an LLVM error, "Program used external function

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > /* snip */ I updated the svn to 60607. It still needed that const change. Added the const word on that member function. Tried building debug, debug still fails horrible. I am going to try to stop by that computer for an hour or so before my next work shift tonight, will completely get rid of every trace

...;> iterator the 1st (or 2nd) items in a sequence of std::pairs.  Does >> select1st/select2nd exist somewhere within LLVM or is there some >> equivalent?  If not, I'll add it. > > Is this making the resultant loop simpler?  C++ without lambda's isn't very friendly to functors, what is the before/after effect of doing this? > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >

...iterator the 1st (or 2nd) items in a sequence of std::pairs. Does >> select1st/select2nd exist somewhere within LLVM or is there some >> equivalent? If not, I'll add it. > > Is this making the resultant loop simpler? C++ without lambda's isn't > very friendly to functors, what is the before/after effect of doing > this? It's going to unify the DagInit constructors into one piece of code. The problem now is there are two constructors. One takes a vector of pairs and the other takes two vectors. They each make sense in their use contexts but it results in a...