search for: functionti

Hello, I am trying to handle some overloaded functions in the LLVM IR. I have a number of functions named "task" in the source code, differing in the number of parameters. And there is a call, let's say: task (a, b). I get the file.ll equivalent and I want to replace the original call task (a,b) with a call to one of the other functions, task(a,b,c). The problem is that due to

Hi Erick, On 2008-03-15, at 04:03, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I was talking to Gordon on #llvm earlier, and he challenged me with > coming up with a way to improve the ocaml binding's type safety. I > think I got an easy solution with phantom types. This could be a good step. I'm not sure I can predict all of the implications; I'd suggest you work up a proof of concept.

Hello all, Here is my GSoC 2012 proposal: Python bindings for LLVM. Any feedback are welcome! *Title: Python bindings for LLVM* *Abstract: * llvm-py provides Python bindings for LLVM. The latest llvm-py supports bindings with Python 2.x version for LLVM 2.x. This project is to improve llvm-py to make it compatible with both Python 2.x and Python 3 for LLVM 3. *Motivation* LLVM is used as a

I was talking to Gordon on #llvm earlier, and he challenged me with coming up with a way to improve the ocaml binding's type safety. We can't go letting haskell beat us now, can we? I think I got an easy solution with phantom types. For those who don't know what the problem is, the ocaml bindings share one type between whole class branches (like values). This means we need to downcast