search for: functionial

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "functionial".

Did you mean: functional
2016 Apr 15
2
phys reg liveness during foldMemoryOperandImpl()
Hi, I wonder if it would be possible to extend foldMemoryOperandImp() so that targets can check for liveness of a particular phys reg? The case I am thinking of is when the new instruction clobbers the CC reg, while the old one did not. In this case the new instruction can only become a replacement if the CC reg is known to be dead. The idea is that liveness of phys regs should be available
2016 Apr 27
2
phys reg liveness during foldMemoryOperandImpl()
I would expect that it shouldn't be too hard to pass around a reference to LiveIntervalAnalysis*. Patches welcome :) - Matthias > On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Jonas Paulsson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > ping. > > Either this can be implemented easily, or the current SystemZ optimization LAY -> AGSI in foldMemoryOperandImpl() should be
2007 Jun 08
1
[LLVMdev] mistake in documentation? [http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html]
Hi, For the section regarding Functions, the doc says: "The first basic block in a program is special in two ways: it is immediately executed on entrance to the function, and it is not allowed to have predecessor basic blocks" Is this really supposed to say: "The first basic block in a functionis special in two ways:" ? Thanks, Ivan --------------------- Ivan Novick
2013 Sep 06
1
Importing function that is previously imported by other package
Dear developeRs, I encounter the following problem: in the current version of my package FrF2, certain calls to a functioni do not work when package combinat is loaded, because function combn from combinat masks the function from utils that my package uses. I tried to solve this issue by importing function combn into the namespace of FrF2; I don't need to export it, I just want to use it
2014 Jul 04
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/03/2014 08:44 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: > >> I suppose we could try making an ISOLINUX CD for the local boot, which then >> uses pxechn.c32 to connect to our PXE server? > > pxechn.c32 requires a functional PXELINUX. If I understand the issue correctly, is it that pxelinux.0 does not have a network stack and