Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "funct_type".
Did you mean:
func_type
2017 Jan 10
2
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
...m, with the explicit `fptr* ptr`).
>>
>
> Not sure I follow. You're saying this:
>
> typedef int func_type(const int&);
>
> is easier for you to read than this:
>
> using func_type = int(const int&);
>
> ?
>
>
I never saw syntax
typedef int funct_type(const int&);
I tried to use it and I got compile error for code:
int z(const int&);
int main() {
typedef int fptr(const int&);
fptr f = z;
f(42);
}
where typedef int (*fptr)(const int&)
works.
>
>> -- Sanjoy
>> _____________________________________...
2017 Jan 09
3
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
Hi,
Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was
trying to say:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das
<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>> +1 Exactly this.
>> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much
>> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the
>>