search for: funcal

Dear all, I have a list of time series and want to plot them. Is there a way that the dot-dot-dot argument of a function accepts a list as single arguments, such as funcall in several Lisp dialects? Greetings Johannes

...problem with other atoms, e.g. variable names? This sounds like something that should be implemented in the language's runtime library. On May 4, 2014 7:15 PM, "Alexander Popolitov" <popolit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm trying to implement lisp's funcall function, which roughly calls a > function, name of which > is known only at runtime. > I know that LLVM IR 'call' directive can accept function pointers, so the > question is, > is there a simple way to get a function pointer from a function name > (represented as e.g. i...

> There are other instances, such as Reduce where there is a bug > report pending that amounts to the same issue. Performing surgery on > expressions and calling eval is not good practice at the R level and > probably not a good idea at the C level either. It is worth thinking > this through carefully before a adopting a solution, which is what we > will be doing. Surgery on

Hi All, I'd like to be able to specify the ordered composition of several functions. So I defined compose: compose <- function(f,g){ function(x){f(g(x))} } and some simple test functions: plus2 <- function(x){x+2} plus3 <- function(x){x+3} plus4 <- function(x){x+4} > (compose(plus2,compose(plus3,plus4)))(3) [1] 12 Works fine. But trying to reduce a list of functions by

Dear list members, I recall seeing a convenience function for applying multiple functions to one object (i.e., almost the opposite of 'mapply?) somewhere. Example: If the function was named ?fun? the output of fun(3.14, mode, typeof, class) would be identical to the output of c(mode(3.14), typeof(3.14), class(3.14)) Is my memory failing me, or does such a function already exists in a

hi, the forum search is disabled so i''ll just ask if Rails known to work on Ruby 1.9? something changed wrt to ''send'' and private methods, now they have to be renamed to ''funcall''. there were only a couple of these in rubygems, and after changing them it worked fine, even compiling fastcgi bindings etc.. so i figured i would do the same to rails and now im getting this (no line number..) a www # rails wtf can''t convert Enumerable::Enumerator into Arra...

Full_Name: David Bauer Version: 1.9 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (160.91.245.8) In the file gram.y, the xxsubscript function generates a LANGSXP with another LANGSXP as its CDR. I believe that this is a mistake and that the second LANGSXP should be a LISTSXP. The inputs a1, a3 are parameters to the subscript function (a2), and as such they should be in a dotted-pair list. David Bauer

Would introducing the new frame, with the call to local(), cause problems when you use frame counting instead of <<- to modify variables outside the scope of lapply's FUN, I think the frame counts may have to change. E.g., here is code from actuar::simul() that might be affected: x <- unlist(lapply(nodes[[i]], seq)) lapply(nodes[(i + 1):(nlevels - 1)],

At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not

...INUX-I386-NOT: movl __llvm__unsafe_stack_ptr +; LINUX-I386: .cfi_endproc + +; LINUX-X64: test8a: +; LINUX-X64-NOT: movq %fs:640 +; LINUX-X64: .cfi_endproc + +; DARWIN-X64: test8a: +; DARWIN-X64-NOT: movq ___llvm__unsafe_stack_ptr +; DARWIN-X64: .cfi_endproc + %b = alloca i32, align 4 + call void @funcall(i32* %b) nounwind + ret void +} + +; test8b: Passing addr-of to function call +; safestack attribute +; Requires protector. +define void @test8b() nounwind uwtable safestack { +entry: +; LINUX-I386: test8b: +; LINUX-I386: movl __llvm__unsafe_stack_ptr +; LINUX-I386-NEXT: movl %gs: + +;...

...--------------------------------------------- c89 -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -OPT:IEEE_NaN_inf=ON -g -c unique.c -o unique.o cc-1185 c89: WARNING File = unique.c, Line = 625 An enumerated type is mixed with another type. b = deparse1(funcall, 1); ^ cc-1185 c89: WARNING File = unique.c, Line = 655 An enumerated type is mixed with another type. b = deparse1(b, 1); ^ cc-1185 c89: WARNING File = unique.c, Line = 663 An enumerated type is mixed with another type....