Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "funcaddr".
Did you mean:
func_addr
2012 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Xin Tong
> Subject: [LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions
> I have a function address held in an uint64_t. I would like to cast
> the function address to a function prototype and create a call to the
> function in LLVM. How could I do this ?
This is what works for us:
2010 Jun 24
1
[LLVMdev] Why would -disable-fp-elim cause SEGV in JIT, when without it code works fine?
...t; to unwind the stack but there is none available.
>
> Have you been able to succeed at linking statically with LLVM to get
> the gdb JIT interface working? That should fix this, and give you the
> ability to disas JITed functions.
>
> Another useful technique is to use x/20i<funcaddr> to look at the
> assembly of the JITed function to see what is wrong with it. You
> should be able to get the function addresses from your addr2line
> output. As a last resort, you can unwind the stack yourself, so long
> as all the code you're running has frame pointers enab...
2012 Jun 18
4
[LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions
I have a function address held in an uint64_t. I would like to cast
the function address to a function prototype and create a call to the
function in LLVM. How could I do this ?
Thanks
Xin
2010 Jun 23
0
[LLVMdev] Why would -disable-fp-elim cause SEGV in JIT, when without it code works fine?
...hen it is trying to use dwarf
to unwind the stack but there is none available.
Have you been able to succeed at linking statically with LLVM to get
the gdb JIT interface working? That should fix this, and give you the
ability to disas JITed functions.
Another useful technique is to use x/20i <funcaddr> to look at the
assembly of the JITed function to see what is wrong with it. You
should be able to get the function addresses from your addr2line
output. As a last resort, you can unwind the stack yourself, so long
as all the code you're running has frame pointers enabled.
Reid
On Wed, J...
2010 Jun 23
2
[LLVMdev] Why would -disable-fp-elim cause SEGV in JIT, when without it code works fine?
I have this situation when the same code SEGVs in JIT with option
-disable-fp-elim and works fine without it.
How can this possibly happen?
Is it possible that there is a bug in JIT that stack isn't properly
lowered for local variables when prologs are present?
Or maybe JIT can accidentally use ebp for some values when it's supposed
to be only used by frame pointer value.
Stack (see
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
...type
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.res/temp.dep/temp.dep.type
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.res/temp.dep/temp.dep.constexpr/Output
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.res/temp.dep.res/temp.point
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.fct.spec/temp.deduct/temp.deduct.funcaddr
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.static/Output
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.class
12K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class...