search for: funargs

...(value ); System.err.println("\r\n"); } } /** * if I pass mean a org.omegahat.Environment.DataStructures.numeric what do I get? NaN */ static public void runMeanByNumericList_nan(REvaluator e, ROmegahatInterpreter interp) { Object[] funArgs = new Object[1]; // given argument is not numeric or logical org.omegahat.Environment.DataStructures.numeric rList1 = new org.omegahat.Environment.DataStructures.numeric(3); double[] dList = new double[3]; dList[0] = (double) 1.1; d...

...rgs){ ROmegahatInterpreter interp = new ROmegahatInterpreter( ROmegahatInterpreter.fixArgs(args),false); REvaluator e=new REvaluator(); System.out.println("done w/ evaluator constructor"); // String[] objects = (String[])e.call("objects"); int[] seq; Object[] funArgs = new Object[2]; funArgs[0]=new Integer(1); funArgs[1]=new Integer(10); seq=(int[])e.call("seq",funArgs); System.out.println("length "+seq.length); for(int i=0;i<seq.length;i++){ System.out.print(seq[i]+" "); } System.out.println(); } pub...

I've read in many places that R semantics are based on Scheme semantics. As a long-time Lisp user and implementor, I've tried to make this more precise, and this is what I've found so far. I've excluded trivial things that aren't basic semantic issues: support for arbitrary-precision integers; subscripting; general style; etc. I would appreciate corrections or additions from

...e != null) interp.show(value); } /** * */ static public void main(String[] args) { ROmegahatInterpreter interp = new ROmegahatInterpreter(ROmegahatInterpreter.fixArgs(args), false); REvaluator e = new REvaluator(); Object[] funArgs; String[] objects; Object value; int i; run_sourceRFile(e, interp); } } the corresponding core dump when using java -------------------------------------------- [lobrien at fox] ./RJava Loading RInterpreter library R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for S...