Displaying 20 results from an estimated 41859 matches for "fulled".
Did you mean:
filled
2019 Sep 11
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] tests: Convert some tests to use nbdsh instead of qemu-io.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:48:28AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
> > qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
> >
> > You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
> > duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be
2019 Sep 11
4
[PATCH nbdkit] tests: Convert some tests to use nbdsh instead of qemu-io.
Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be refactored into a
Python function. When I tried to do that, I got loads of strange
Python problems which may indicate bugs in nbdsh itself or problems
with my
2019 Apr 17
1
Full mail
Hello,
I am getting strange messages on logs and I cannot find any reason. Could
someone point me on what's wrong with my dovecot configuration?
~# dovecot -n
# 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 ()
# OS: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9 ext4
~# grep 'full mail' //var/log/dovecot.log
Apr 16 19:25:43 imap(phaoost at
2005 Mar 18
5
may be save on other directory
Hi!
I need use rsync for incremental backup, but i need save that incremental
data on diferent directory, for example
I have a Full backup on directory ./FULL, and carpets for ./monday ... I
need to compare the sources with ./FULL and the diferents files save on
../monday .. but not in ./FULL
---------- -----------
SERVER A | | SERVER B |
2011 May 15
5
Question on approximations of full logistic regression model
Hi,
I am trying to construct a logistic regression model from my data (104
patients and 25 events). I build a full model consisting of five
predictors with the use of penalization by rms package (lrm, pentrace
etc) because of events per variable issue. Then, I tried to approximate
the full model by step-down technique predicting L from all of the
componet variables using ordinary least squares
2018 May 10
4
kernel spew from nouveau/ swiotlb
Greetings,
When box is earning its keep, nouveau/swiotlb grumble.. a LOT. The
below is from master.today.
[12594.640959] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes)
[12594.693000] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes)
[12594.713787] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes)
[12594.743413] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer
2019 Sep 17
2
Imaptest stall
I am also testing rbox plugin ;) So I would like just the imaptest tool
to work. No one else ever run into this? I saw something similar on the
mailing list a long time ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Miller via dovecot [mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org]
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Imaptest stall
If you're just speed testing for writing probably sdbox or maildir
2007 Nov 19
1
rsync-ing from two locations with same filenames (at different versions)
Hello,
I would like to have a full repository, say, holding files
full/a.txt (version 1)
full/b.txt (version 1)
full/c.txt (version 1)
and a repository of updates, for example
new/b.txt (version 2 - newer)
Then, I would like to call
rsync [flags] new/ full/ destination
to get
destination/a.txt (v.1)
destination/b.txt (v.2)
destination/c.txt (v.1)
This simple case works
2005 Sep 24
0
[Bug 3116] New: large tar files: 1 gig size: retransmitted: rsync_rsh
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116
Summary: large tar files: 1 gig size: retransmitted: rsync_rsh
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2016 Aug 09
1
C7 Backup problem
On Tue, August 9, 2016 11:51 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 11:11 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> | 78 | backup-fd | 2016-08-08 09:52:57 | B | F | 191,024 |
>> 7,978,295,072 | T |
>>
>> | 79 | backup-fd | 2016-08-08 12:10:31 | B | F | 0 |
>> 0 | A |
>>
>> | 80 | backup-fd | 2016-08-09 03:05:03 |
2012 Sep 14
1
Bonding Eth interfaces - unexpeceted results
CentOS 6.2.........
Why do the physical interfaces report (correctly) that they're negotiated at 1000Mb/s, but when I `cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0` I get 100Mbps for the member interfaces, and when I ` mii-tool bond0` I get 10Mbps for the bond?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethtool em1
Settings for em1:
Supported ports: [
2019 Oct 18
3
Dovecot v2.3.8 released
On 2019-10-18 13:25, Tom Sommer via dovecot wrote:
> I am seeing a lot of errors since the upgrade, on multiple client
> accounts:
>
> Info: Connection closed: read(size=7902) failed: Connection reset by
> peer (UID FETCH running for 0.242 + waiting input/output for 108.816
> secs, 60 B in + 24780576+8192 B out, state=wait-output)
>
> Using NFS storage (not running with
2009 May 28
2
Connection queue full on dovecot 1.1.14 and 1.1.15
Hello,
sometimes we get the following errors on out dovecot proxies:
dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection
queue full (no auth attempts): REMOTE=<IP> LOCAL=<IP> TLS handshaking
dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection
queue full (no auth attempts): REMOTE=<IP> LOCAL=<IP> TLS handshaking
dovecot: May 27 20:06:10
2012 Sep 27
5
Understanding IFB
I''m experiencing a problem with masquerade downloads saturating my
internet connection. I''ve implemented an IFB and now am looking into
flow keys. Although I''ve read the documentation, I''m not sure I have
this right. Can someone help?
/etc/shorewall/params:
MID_IF=eth0
MID_IF_TC=1
INET1_IF=eth1
INET1_IF_TC=2
INET1_IFB_IF=ifb0
INET1_IFB_TC=3
Note: MID_IF
2019 Oct 08
4
Dovecot v2.3.8 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Changes
+ Added mail_delivery_started and mail_delivery_finished events, see
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/list_of_events/ for details.
+ dsync-replication: Don't replicate users who have "noreplicate" extra
field in
2019 Oct 08
4
Dovecot v2.3.8 released
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Changes
+ Added mail_delivery_started and mail_delivery_finished events, see
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/list_of_events/ for details.
+ dsync-replication: Don't replicate users who have "noreplicate" extra
field in
2016 Aug 09
4
C7 Backup problem
Good morning list,
I've a question about backup performed with bacula.
I manage a DELL server (dedicated on provider) with C7. I use bacula as
backup system with volumes on disk. System performs mon-sat incremental
backups and Sun full backup at 03.00 AM. I've another pool (named
update) where I performs backup before each software update. Storage is
on and external disk 2.5' of
2004 Oct 28
3
new crash in dovecot-auth test51
#0 io_remove (io=0x0) at ioloop.c:51
51 if ((io->condition & IO_NOTIFY_MASK) != 0) {
(gdb) bt
#0 io_remove (io=0x0) at ioloop.c:51
#1 0x0804fd68 in auth_client_connection_destroy_wait (conn=0x80877d8) at auth-client-connection.c:494
#2 0x08050acd in auth_callback (request=0x84716b8, result=134681554, reply=0x0, reply_size=0) at auth-client-connection.c:104
#3 0x08050950 in
2008 Apr 30
5
Quick Submit Button Question...
Hello,
Can I pass a variable from a submit button only? I have a form that the
user fills out and I need two different submit buttons - one for ''sync''
and one for ''full push''. I was thinking I could add some sort of param
to the button, but it''s not working... is there a way to do this? I have
this:
<%= submit_tag ''push to
2008 Jun 04
11
traffic shaping and classes
I''m looking over this traffic shaping available in the tc* files.
I went through this when I did my own traffic shaping outside of
shorewall previously.
For the average (i.e. home, perhaps) user, I''ve never understood why we
use these more complicated shaping algorithms that define classes and
guaranteed minimums and maximums and so forth.
For most home, or other small use