search for: fugro

...r,xiflat,yiflat) xiflat <- unlist(theData[7]) yiflat <- unlist(theData[9]) tri_list_from_deldir <- tsearch(x,y,tri_deldir,xiflat,yiflat) tri_list_from_delaunayn <- tsearch(x,y,tri_delaunayn,xiflat,yiflat) Kam Yuen Software Developer T +44 (0)1491 820634| F +44 (0)1491 820599 k.yuen at fugro.com<mailto:k.yuen at fugro.com> | www.fugro.com<http://www.fugro.com/> Fugro GB Marine Limited Fugro House, Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 9RB, UK Registration No: 1135456 | VAT No: GB 579 3459 84 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...y be reasonably expected. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Yuen, Kam <k.yuen at fugro.com> wrote: > The problem: > I would like to translate the Octave algorithm in griddata.m to R. > Within the griddata algorithm calls are made to the Delaunay function. For > the R translation I have found delaunayn within the "geometry" package and > also the deldir pa...

...s in a rectangular grid. When you triangulate a rectangle it is arbitrary whether you use the SW-NE or the SE-NW diagonal and that looks like the only difference between the various algorithms. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 5:14 AM, Yuen, Kam <k.yuen at fugro.com> wrote: > Bill, > > > > It wasn?t really the orientation I was worried about. > > I should perhaps have phrased the question better. It was really about the > fact that for the larger input example the triangles **are not** the same > for each implementation. >...

...the limit is 12 characters for NT, our Windows 98, 2000 and XP machines work with longer share names. If so does anyone know if there is a patch to make long share names work with NTWS 4.0? Best regards, Keith ------------------------------------------------ Keith Grabham Senior ICT Administrator Fugro-UDI Ltd Denmore Road Bridge of Don Aberdeen AB23 8JW Tel: +44 (0) 1224 257500 Ext 7570 Fax: +44 (0) 1224 853911 Direct: +44 (0) 1224 257570 Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 852334 <http://www.fugro-udi.co.uk> e-mail k.grabham@fugro-udi.co.uk ------------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT NO...

...in glamor. Add test for a rendering bug in libreoffice. Gaetan Nadon (1): config: remove unrequired AC_HEADER_STDC Jeremy Huddleston (2): Report which test groups passed successfully Include strings.h for strcasecmp Matt Craighead (1): fix compiler warnings Vikram Fugro (1): t_triangles: Fix for triangles(trapezoids) test case git tag: rendercheck-1.5 http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/rendercheck-1.5.tar.bz2 MD5: 61d02044a2b1b1afb20334308bdca2d0 rendercheck-1.5.tar.bz2 SHA1: dac876f347ee97c09b050c83de3a7b67546c8fe0 rendercheck-1.5.tar.b...

...g shows at all. I can't think what to do next, has anyone seen this problem before and know a fix? I can provide some more verbose debug output if necessary, I didn't want to output reams of info unless it was absolutely necessary. -- Dougie Dunn Seismic processing systems administrator Fugro-Geoteam Limited

Hello, We have had Samba 2.2.2 running successfully for some time on an Ultra 10 with Solaris 2.8. Over the last few days we have been having trouble with 'loosing' access to some new shares and found that some new users had problems accessing their home dirs. To get around the problem with the home dirs we shortened the length of the path in the passwd file and moved the dir

Hello > 2004/08/23 14:15:39, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(531) > tdb(/var/opt/samba/locks/connections.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 91 > ltype=2 > (No locks available) We get the same message on SuSE 9.3 running samba 3.0 , can you give us any pointers on solving this? Apparently it has something to do with kernel locks??????