search for: fud

I have just got an email was trying to source videos for theora test media here is the message: "Intrinsically H.264 properly encoded should be about 30% more efficient than Theora." is this FUD or not? tom_a_sparks

..., not M$ with its miserable >> track record for security.  And use a "real" firewall > > sorry, but everybody in the security business when he is not developer > of snakeoil aka anti-virus will tell you the exactly opposite Hi Reindl, And those in the business of hawking FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt). The more knowledgeable sources actually have discussion on the particulars. > there is nothing like a "good anti-virus" which will protect you from new treats, new incarnations slip through signatures before new signatures are published and nothing to pr...

In the up and coming wiki, don't forget to have an FAQ/Fight against FUD section. Looking at the web in January an upstream vendor employee said some things in his wiki. In Feb/March CentOS was discussed on the Fedora-list/Slashdot. - Common myths about the legality/ethicality of CentOS - CentOS providing value to Open Source as a whole - Projects emanating from CentOS...

I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD. Are there any documented, corportate users of rsync? Testimonials? In short, how do I drag this risk-averse group out of the FTP age into the rsync present? /p

...ing SSSD. It's much more stable and > reliable than winbindd. Can't let comments like this pass. sssd does something slightly different than winbindd, so may or may not be what the person needs. winbindd is extremely reliable and fully supported by the Samba Team, please don't post FUD about Samba components. If you have winbindd problems, post bug reports not FUD. Thanks, Jeremy.

Steven Vaughan-Nichols at Ziff-Davis said: | Unlike all other previous Microsoft operating systems, XP | Home will simply not work in an office network environment | with NetWare, NT, Samba, or Windows 2000 servers. Period. | You simply can't connect to the servers' domains or their | file/print services. Which sounds like they took the SMB client out... | XP Home also has a built-in

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we

...misconception on my part or an actual change in the environment. >> >> Apparently it is the later. > > So systemd moves Linux to more resemble Windows? No. If anything, systemd handles upgrades better than SysV init, since it handles re-execing better. Please stop spreading FUD. Most likely the glibc and openssl updates are what people are talking about. Doesn?t require a reboot, just restarting all the services that might have those libraries loaded. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we

Hello List, Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else? Thanks, Jack

I don''t think this has anything to do with Shorewall but I am not too familiar with iptables stuff yet so I''m not sure. Running Shorewall shorewall-1.4.9 on Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 Kernel 2.4.22-37mdk. Run "nmap -sP 192.168.x.x/24" (for example), where 192.168.x.x/24 is the LAN. You can do this from a firewall/router, or even from a

...ing Fedora 24 - with a customized /etc/resolv.conf - fileserver, webservers, nameservers, routers, wlan-ap and what not else you only showed that you where unable or unwilling to cope with changes and learn how systemd works - you are free to do so - but then *please* stop spreading unqualified FUD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160806/9e5de304/signature.sig>

...ntoo-based systems and I tried to explain them that CentOS is much better option for enterprises. IT department is interested in stability of the system, so they are ready to give CentOS a try. But the problem came from management and information security division. That guys look much affected by FUD created by M$. They tell the story like "you can not rely on this open source, it is built by just few community geeks, you never know what will happen if the developer will be hit by bus tomorrow" and so on. They especially refer to the last year FUD story published at ZDNet (http://goo....

...t; +}; > + > +/* Per-virtqueue state */ > +struct virtio_fs_vq { > + spinlock_t lock; > + struct virtqueue *vq; /* protected by ->lock */ > + struct work_struct done_work; > + struct list_head queued_reqs; > + struct delayed_work dispatch_work; > + struct fuse_dev *fud; > + bool connected; > + long in_flight; > + char name[24]; I'd keep names somewhere separate as they are not used on data path. > +} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > + > +/* A virtio-fs device instance */ > +struct virtio_fs { > + struct list_head list; /* on virtio...

...t; +}; > + > +/* Per-virtqueue state */ > +struct virtio_fs_vq { > + spinlock_t lock; > + struct virtqueue *vq; /* protected by ->lock */ > + struct work_struct done_work; > + struct list_head queued_reqs; > + struct delayed_work dispatch_work; > + struct fuse_dev *fud; > + bool connected; > + long in_flight; > + char name[24]; I'd keep names somewhere separate as they are not used on data path. > +} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > + > +/* A virtio-fs device instance */ > +struct virtio_fs { > + struct list_head list; /* on virtio...

On 28 August 2015 at 18:02, Jason Kim <jasonk at codeaurora.org> wrote: > IMO having to disable 2/3 of the tests means the patch isn't ready yet. Dan is absolutely right. > (*) The tests weren’t all stable to begin with. That's not a reason to break them more. If you can't prove they're correct, you can't prove you broken them more, especially on other arches.

...e state */ > > +struct virtio_fs_vq { > > + spinlock_t lock; > > + struct virtqueue *vq; /* protected by ->lock */ > > + struct work_struct done_work; > > + struct list_head queued_reqs; > > + struct delayed_work dispatch_work; > > + struct fuse_dev *fud; > > + bool connected; > > + long in_flight; > > + char name[24]; > > I'd keep names somewhere separate as they are not used on data path. Ok, this sounds like a nice to have. Will take care of this once base patch gets merged. [..] > > +struct virtio_fs_forget...

...fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c index c483482185b6..eadaea6eb8e2 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static void virtio_fs_free_devs(struct virtio_fs *fs) if (!fsvq->fud) continue; - /* TODO need to quiesce/end_requests/decrement dev_count */ fuse_dev_free(fsvq->fud); fsvq->fud = NULL; } @@ -1022,7 +1021,6 @@ static int virtio_fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb) if (i == VQ_REQUEST) continue; /* already initialized */ fuse_dev_insta...

|> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect |> ext3 is the problem. I heard some people losing all |> of their data on ext3-formatted disks. Stay away |> from it. | | Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD? | By all accounts I've ever seen, Ext. 3 has been | stable for *long* time before it was even included | in the stock Kernel tree. Do you want to say that nobody ever lost any data on ext3-formatted disks? Be realistic. But does it warrant my exhortation to stay away from it? Probably no...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/01/richard_bennett_utorrent_udp/ FUD? Interesting? Boring? New news? Old news? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599