search for: fucntionality

hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =

2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose

Hi Nabila, > My problem is how to call a method > suppose this fucntion > void A(int x) > { > x=x+1; > > } > > should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and > create for it a basic bloc? you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it. You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is

Hi Nabila, > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block. However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. ... > i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the > function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function >

I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the in fact the fucntion is : void consume(int , int * ); std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params; int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y); CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(), int32_16_params.end(), "",

2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> > > noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to > be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you

Hi Nabila, > Now when i tried this pass an error says: > Wrong type for attribute noalias > tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind > > > noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to > be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you correct > your code that adds the attribute.

Hi Nabila, > Now when i tried this pass an error says: > Wrong type for attribute noalias > tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you correct your code that adds the attribute. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi there, I want to generate a large amount of functions, say f=function(x,t) exp(-t[1]-t[2]*g_1(x)-t[3]*g_2(1+x)) where g_1(x) and g_2(x) are from a long list of moments, such as x, x^2, log(x), log(1+x) .. and so on. Any suggestions on how to do this efficiently? thanks a lot. x.w

Dear R users, I would like to adjust the x axis the way I wanted using "forestplot(labeltext, mean, lower, upper, align = NULL, xlab = "", zero = 0, graphwidth = unit(2, "inches"), col = meta.colors(), xlog = FALSE)". I tried using xaxt="n" and then redefine the axis using axis(1, at=c(0,0.5,1.0 ,1.5,2.0,2.5),label=c(0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5)), but it

Hi, all, I found that the smooth.spline() function produces different results between R and S-Plus. I was trying to play different parameters of the function without any success. The script of the function contains Fortran code, so it seems impossible to port the code from S-Plus to R (or I may be wrong). Can anyone suggest anything so that I can produce the same result in R as in S-plus? Thanks

2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> >> >> noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it >> to >> be on the second argument

Hi Nabila, > where did the "noalias" attribute and "tail call" (rather than "call") come > from? Are you setting these yourself or running some optimization pass after > your pass? > > > i have written a module pass and i have compiled it and then you didn't answer my questions, you just repeated what you said before. Ciao,

I would like to solve the equation is is the sum from k = i to N of choose(N,k) * MR ^ k * (1 - MR) ^ (N - k) - 0.50 = 0 I want to solve for MR. This seems like a non-linear equation to me. But I am having a hard time writing the function that implements the above. I could use 'for(...) as a brute force appoarch but I would like a more "elegant" solution. The variables 'N'

2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > where did the "noalias" attribute and "tail call" (rather than "call") >> come >> from? Are you setting these yourself or running some optimization pass >> after >> your pass? >> >> >> i have written a module pass and i have compiled

Dear all, I have the following problem with the uniroot function. I want to find roots for the fucntion "Fp2" which is defined as below. Fz <- function(z){0.8*pnorm(z)+p1*pnorm(z-u1)+(0.2-p1)*pnorm(z-u2)} Fp <- function(t){(1-Fz(abs(qnorm(1-(t/2)))))+(Fz(-abs(qnorm(1-(t/2)))))} Fp2 <- function(t) {Fp(t)-0.8*t/alpha} th <- uniroot(Fp2, lower =0, upper =1,

Is there a fuction that will allow me to retrun the filename for a script from within that script. fir instance If I have a script "myscript.r": FileName<-unknown.fucntion() print(FileName) and run it source("myscript.r") will return "myscript.r" Thanks Nevil Amos [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi! I am using the fft() function the base package to transform some 1d signal. If I use this standar fucntion I get a very huge first fourier coeficient. I think this dues to the handling of the borders of the signal. Usually in fft especially in image processing the signal is simulated to be continuous by adding the signal several times periodically. My question is, is there some function

Dear R helpers Suppose I have a portfolio of securities with exposure to Equity, Bonds and Forex (say $ 1000000 each). Is there any fucntion in R that will help me calculate Value at Risk (VaR) using Monte carlo Simulation , Historic simulation and Variance - Covariance Simulation. With regards Maithili

Dear all, in an LDA analysis with n groups n-1 LD functions result. Implicitly this defines an LD fucntion for the last group. Does there exist code already to explictly construct this LD function? Thanks, Stefan