search for: fty

----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Molloy via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Vaivaswatha Nagaraj" <vn at compilertree.com> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:41:46 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Function attributes for LibFunc and its impact on GlobalsAA > >

...ng a function with bad signature", when my pass inserts a call to this function. But I don't have any problems with my pass if I run clang -emit-llvm -S, then llc and then gcc. With this approach I get a binary with my instrumentation inserted. This line causes a problem - assert((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"); I tried to get a dump of FTy->getParamType(i) and Args[i]->getType(), but I wasn't able to do it in gdb - everytime I create...

...Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the function. 2. Based on its data type like character array or integer array, pointer, int, char, take different action. 3. I have added following code to check its data type. // F is any function basically of type function * FunctionType *FTy = F->getFunctionType(); unsigned int numArgs = FTy->getNumParams(); //Currently just checking data type of the 0th argument. Eventually will be running it in the loop from 0 to numArgs. errs() << "\n1 Argument type int 32 : " << FTy->getParamType(0)->isIntegerTy...

...that this sort of splitting doesn't work for signed values, so we +// compute the sign on those manually and then perform an unsigned multiply. static bool expandIntegerMUL(BuildUtil *bld, Instruction *mul) { const bool highResult = mul->subOp == NV50_IR_SUBOP_MUL_HIGH; - DataType fTy = mul->sType; // full type - DataType hTy; + DataType fTy; // full type + switch (mul->sType) { + case TYPE_S32: fTy = TYPE_U32; break; + case TYPE_S64: fTy = TYPE_U64; break; + default: fTy = mul->sType; break; + } + + DataType hTy; // half type switch (fTy) { - case...

...statments scalarized array operations function calls with *no arguments* simple common blocks Function calls with more than one argument don't work. Specifically: ..../gfortran funccall-1arg.f -o funccall-1arg.exe ..../llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:209: failed assertion `(Params.size() == FTy->getNumParams() || (FTy->isVarArg() && Params.size() > FTy->getNumParams())) && "Calling a function with bad signature!"' funccall-1arg.f: In function 'MAIN__': funccall-1arg.f:5: internal compiler error: Abort trap Please submit a full bug report,...

...ment; it does not represent what the type of the actual memory object passed into the function will be. A caller can cast a pointer of one structure type to a different structure type and pass that into a function. > > // F is any function basically of type function * > FunctionType *FTy = F->getFunctionType(); > unsigned int numArgs = FTy->getNumParams(); > > //Currently just checking data type of the 0th argument. Eventually > will be running it in the loop from 0 to numArgs. > errs() << "\n1 Argument type int 32 : " << > FTy->ge...

...; function calls with *no arguments* > simple common blocks Great! > Function calls with more than one argument don't work. Specifically: > > ..../gfortran funccall-1arg.f -o funccall-1arg.exe > ..../llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:209: failed assertion > `(Params.size() == FTy->getNumParams() || (FTy->isVarArg() && > Params.size() > FTy->getNumParams())) && "Calling a function with bad > signature!"' > funccall-1arg.f: In function 'MAIN__': > funccall-1arg.f:5: internal compiler error: Abort trap > Please s...

The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 around 7PM PDT. The assertion is Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/ build.llvm-gcc-x86_64-darwin10-selfhost/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/ src/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp,...

...nt a simple C program then I get the following exception: $ opt -o a.bc -load /data/llvm3.1/Release+Asserts/lib/Dat.so -MyPass < malloc.bc opt: Instructions.cpp:269: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, const llvm::Twine&): Assertion `(Args.size() == FTy->getNumParams() || (FTy->isVarArg() && Args.size() > FTy->getNumParams())) && "Calling a function with bad signature!"' failed. In older llvm, I had the following line: CallInst::Create(func, Opts, Opts , "", newBB); Which I have now modified f...

...nths: int 99999 0 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 ... This data frame needs to be converted to long format with 5 variables repeating over 4 observations. > rcl <- reshape(rcw,idvar="ICU",varying=2:21,direction="long",v.names=c("init","FTy","FTm","PTy","PTm")) > str(rcl) 'data.frame': 92 obs. of 7 variables: $ ICU : int 1 18 17 9 22 19 6 16 25 26 ... $ time: int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ init: int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 ... $ FTy : int 0 8 12 3 9 1 5 16 5 5 ... $ FTm : int...

Dear All, I'm getting the following error building mainline llvm-gcc 4.2 (LLVM and llvm-gcc are up to date): cc1: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:290: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*): Assertion `(FTy->getNumParams() == 1 || (FTy->isVarArg() && FTy->getNumParams() == 0)) && "Calling a function with bad signature"' failed. Is anyone else seeing this? I get a similar error when compiling mainline llvm-gcc 4.0. -- John T.

When for example some call is wrong error message always looks like this: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /tmp/llvm-svn/llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp, line 247. I believe assert() statements should better be replaced with more detailed p...

Hi everyone, I am trying to have an call instruction that calls global variable The first thing I do is gv = new llvm::GlobalVariable( *(tb->getModule()), fty, false,GlobalValue::InternalLinkage,0, "",0,0,0); fty : i32 ({ i32, [32 x i32] }*) I get stuck here, the fifth argument is the initializer which is a LLVM Constant, I do not know how to describe a function pointer as a constant....

Hi! I have this error while building my code: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!") Actually I'm trying to load functions from .bc file and use them in the code that I'm building with IRBuilder. I found that function parameter type is...

...port/raw_ostream.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h" #include "llvm/BasicBlock.h" #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" #include "llvm/Support/CallSite.h" using namespace llvm; namespace { Constant *f; Function *Fn; FunctionType *FTy; Type *RetTy; std::vector<Type*> Params; class DP : public FunctionPass { public: static char ID; DP() : FunctionPass(ID) {} virtual bool doInitialization(Module &M); virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F); virtual bool doF...

How do you calculate T and P statistics (T- test) in R? Is there a package out there that can do these calculations? Best, Michael Tong Futures Associate Quantitative Research Services Franklin Templeton Investments, Inc. 600 Fifth Ave New York, NY 10020 (212) 632-4254 mtong@templeton.com Notice: All email and instant messages (including attachments) sent to or from Franklin Templeton

...use CallInst::Create to construct a call to a variadic function, and I'm running into the following assertion failure: /localhome/simmon12/workspace/llvm-sources/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:297: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value* const*, unsigned int): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed. I'm using the version of CallInst taking the beginning and end iterators of a vector<Value*>. I made sure to mark the function declara...

...irm this is in fact fixed in current dragonegg svn. On a different question, what are the prospects getting aermod to compile under dragonegg? I am still seeing compile failures of the form... de-gfortran45 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 aermod.f90 -o aermod Assertion failed: ((NumParams == FTy->getNumParams() || (FTy->isVarArg() && NumParams > FTy->getNumParams())) && "Calling a function with bad signature!"), function init, file /sw/src/fink.build/llvm-clang-2.8-1/llvm-2.8/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp, line 242. *** WARNING *** there are active plugi...

...get the following exception: > > $ opt -o a.bc -load /data/llvm3.1/Release+Asserts/lib/Dat.so -MyPass < malloc.bc > > opt: Instructions.cpp:269: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, > llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, const llvm::Twine&): Assertion `(Args.size() == > FTy->getNumParams() || (FTy->isVarArg() && Args.size() > FTy->getNumParams())) > && "Calling a function with bad signature!"' failed. > > In older llvm, I had the following line: > > *CallInst::Create(func, Opts, Opts , "", newBB);* &gt...

Hi, I have recently been using the R program and encountered a recurring problem. I have been trying calculate the correlation of a 16 column table. Everytime I type in cor(test), where test is data that I uploaded into R using the read.table function, I get an error: Error in cor(test) : missing observations in cov/cor In addition: Warning message: In cor(test) : NAs introduced by coercion