Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "ftracer".
Did you mean:
ftrace
2015 Jun 17
2
[LLVMdev] RFC - Stop ignoring -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
...find the profile feedback
data files. See -fprofile-dir.
-fprofile-use-fprofile-use=pathEnable profile feedback-directed
optimizations, and the following optimizations which are generally
profitable only with profile feedback available: -fbranch-probabilities,
-fvpt, -funroll-loops, -fpeel-loops, -ftracer, -ftree-vectorize, and
ftree-loop-distribute-patterns.
By default, GCC emits an error message if the feedback profiles do not
match the source code. This error can be turned into a warning by using
-Wcoverage-mismatch. Note this may result in poorly optimized code.
If path is specified, GCC looks...
2003 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis]
...about optimization.
>
> The settings for -O1, -O2, and -O3 are valid. Every option implied by
> -O3 may not be applicable to every program -- but enabling all those
> options does not seem to be detrimental, except in the case of
> huffbench. Several of the recently-added flags (-ftracer in particular)
> may be candidates for inclusion in -O2 or -O3 for future versions of the
> compiler.
>
> Processor-specific options do not appear to be a major factor in
> performance on these benchmarks. I don't know if this is due to the
> nature of the processor, or i...
2003 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis]
...on.
>>
>> The settings for -O1, -O2, and -O3 are valid. Every option implied by
>> -O3 may not be applicable to every program -- but enabling all those
>> options does not seem to be detrimental, except in the case of
>> huffbench. Several of the recently-added flags (-ftracer in
>> particular)
>> may be candidates for inclusion in -O2 or -O3 for future versions of
>> the
>> compiler.
>>
>> Processor-specific options do not appear to be a major factor in
>> performance on these benchmarks. I don't know if this is due to the...
2004 Aug 20
2
R-devel and gcc 3.4
I tried compiling R-devel from the subversion sources using gcc 3.4.1
and it fails in make check at d-p-q-r-tests. It compiles and works
using gcc 3.3.4. Can post more details if needed (don't remember the
exact error off the top of my head). Linux-i686.
--
robert.kruus at utoronto.ca
linux: the choice of a GNU generation
(ksh at cis.ufl.edu put this on Tshirts in '93)
2003 Nov 19
1
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis]
...t;> The settings for -O1, -O2, and -O3 are valid. Every option implied by
> >> -O3 may not be applicable to every program -- but enabling all those
> >> options does not seem to be detrimental, except in the case of
> >> huffbench. Several of the recently-added flags (-ftracer in
> >> particular)
> >> may be candidates for inclusion in -O2 or -O3 for future versions of
> >> the
> >> compiler.
> >>
> >> Processor-specific options do not appear to be a major factor in
> >> performance on these benchmarks. I d...
2015 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] RFC - Stop ignoring -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
...See -fprofile-dir.
>
> -fprofile-use
> -fprofile-use=path
> Enable profile feedback-directed optimizations, and the following
> optimizations which are generally profitable only with profile
> feedback available: -fbranch-probabilities, -fvpt, -funroll-loops,
> -fpeel-loops, -ftracer, -ftree-vectorize, and
> ftree-loop-distribute-patterns.
> By default, GCC emits an error message if the feedback profiles do
> not match the source code. This error can be turned into a warning
> by using -Wcoverage-mismatch. Note this may result in poorly
> optimized code.
>
&g...
2004 Dec 12
12
switching to Linux, suggestions?
Dear List,
I have acquired a new desktop and wanted to put a free OS on it. I am trying Fedora Core 1, but not sure what the best Linux OS is for using R 2.0.1?
Thank you in advance for your input,
Tom Volscho
************************************
Thomas W. Volscho
Graduate Student
Dept. of Sociology U-2068
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
Phone: (860) 486-3882