search for: fti

----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Molloy via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Vaivaswatha Nagaraj" <vn at compilertree.com> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:41:46 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Function attributes for LibFunc and its impact on GlobalsAA > >

Hello, I'm having troubles with writing a pass. In my pass I've have created a function that has two parameters - both of type i8*. Initially I wrote this function in C, that I translated it into IR, and then by using llc -march=cpp I got it's implementation in cpp code that actually inserts IR instructions. Then, I inserted this cpp code in my pass. And in some places of a program

Hi all, I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do following things : 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the function. 2. Based on its data type like character array or integer array, pointer, int, char, take different action. 3. I have added following code to check its

Retrieving the high 32 bits of a signed multiply is rather annoying. It appears that the simplest way to do this is to compute the absolute value of the arguments, and perform a u32 x u32 -> u64 operation. If the arguments' signs differ, then negate the result. Since there is no u64 support in the cvt instruction, we have the perform the 2's complement negation "by hand".

The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at all, so I had to work from my own sample codes, and generate test cases from them. Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: statement functions intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) loops, goto statments scalarized array operations function calls with *no arguments* simple common

On 2/25/13 1:44 PM, teja tamboli wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to > iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do > following things : Interesting. Just out of curiosity, can you tell us what your project is about? > > 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: > > statement functions > intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) > loops, goto statments > scalarized array operations > function calls with *no arguments* > simple common blocks Great! > Function calls with more than one argument don't work.

The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 around 7PM PDT. The assertion is Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

Is it an undocumented (at least I missed it if it's documented) feature of the reshape function to do numeric variables followed by character? I ask because that seems to be the case below. > str(rcw) 'data.frame': 23 obs. of 21 variables: $ ICU : int 1 18 17 9 22 19 6 16 25 26 ... $ Q6.RC.1 : chr "SM" "JF" "IW"

Dear All, I'm getting the following error building mainline llvm-gcc 4.2 (LLVM and llvm-gcc are up to date): cc1: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:290: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*): Assertion `(FTy->getNumParams() == 1 || (FTy->isVarArg() && FTy->getNumParams() == 0)) && "Calling a function with bad

When for example some call is wrong error message always looks like this: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /tmp/llvm-svn/llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp, line 247. I believe assert() statements should better be replaced with more

Hi everyone, I am trying to have an call instruction that calls global variable The first thing I do is gv = new llvm::GlobalVariable( *(tb->getModule()), fty, false,GlobalValue::InternalLinkage,0, "",0,0,0); fty : i32 ({ i32, [32 x i32] }*) I get stuck here, the fifth argument is the

Hi! I have this error while building my code: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!") Actually I'm trying to load functions from .bc file and use them in the code that I'm building with IRBuilder. I found that function parameter type is %struct.reValue* and

Hi all, Sorry for the inconvenient about the previous post. The files were not attached. So I put them here again. I am a newbie in LLVM and I am trying to replace the function like: old function || new function ============================== ========= int haha(int a) { int haha(int a, char* ID) { ===> }

...tions? Best, Michael Tong Futures Associate Quantitative Research Services Franklin Templeton Investments, Inc. 600 Fifth Ave New York, NY 10020 (212) 632-4254 mtong@templeton.com Notice: All email and instant messages (including attachments) sent to or from Franklin Templeton Investments (FTI) personnel may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by FTI and its agents, or authorized law enforcement personnel, without further notice or consent. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm trying to use CallInst::Create to construct a call to a variadic function, and I'm running into the following assertion failure: /localhome/simmon12/workspace/llvm-sources/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:297: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value* const*, unsigned int): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType())

On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:26:35PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > I am finding that llvm 2.8 rc3 with dragonegg svn built against current > > gcc-4_5-branch doesn't appear to allow gfortran to use -ffast-math. Attempting > > to compile code using the dragonegg plugin under gcc 4.5.2 with that option produces the error... > > > > f951:

Hi Ahmad, On 03/01/13 16:26, Hassan, Ahmad wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. > The code snippet looks like the following: > > Constant *func; > > void add( Module *M) { > > func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); this function has no

...hanks. Best, Michael Tong Futures Associate Quantitative Research Services Franklin Templeton Investments, Inc. 600 Fifth Ave New York, NY 10020 (212) 632-4254 mtong@templeton.com Notice: All email and instant messages (including attachments) sent to or from Franklin Templeton Investments (FTI) personnel may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by FTI and its agents, or authorized law enforcement personnel, without further notice or consent. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]