search for: fsveriti

The fstests supports different kind of fs testing, better to cc specific fs mailing list for specific fs testing, to get better reviewing points. So record these mailing lists and files related with them in MAINTAINERS file. Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang at kernel.org> --- If someone mailing list doesn't want to be in cc list of related fstests patch, please reply this email,

Some people contribute to someone specific fs testing mostly, record some of them as Reviewer. Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang at kernel.org> --- If someone doesn't want to be in cc list of related fstests patch, please reply this email, I'll remove that reviewer line. Or if someone else (who contribute to fstests very much) would like to a specific reviewer, nominate yourself to

Hi Zorro, On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:14:09AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > +FSVERITY > +L: fsverity at lists.linux.dev > +S: Supported > +F: common/verity > + > +FSCRYPT > +L: linux-fscrypt at vger.kernel.org > +S: Supported > +F: common/encrypt Most of the encrypt and verity tests are in tests/generic/ and are in the 'encrypt' or 'verity' test

I think I might be mad to include that many mailing lists in this patchset... As I explained in [PATCH 1/5], fstests covers more and more fs testing thing, so we always get help from fs specific mailing list, due to they learn about their features and bugs more. Besides that, some folks help to review patches (relevant with them) more often. So I'd like to bring in the similar way of