search for: fsname_norootdir

...that command on a loop until it catches it. Is there any other way of translating the key to the inode? > > If the contention is for the root directory of a share, and you don't > actually need lock coherency there, then you could think about using the > > fileid:algorithm = fsname_norootdir > > option. However, I note you're using "fileid:algorithm = fsid". If > that is needed for Cephfs then the fsname_norootdir option might not be > appropriate. > This was a leftover from a short-lived experiment with OCFS2 where I think it was required. I think CephF...

...lients are accessing the file represented by the key. If it is constantly and heavily then that shouldn't be a problem. ;-) If the contention is for the root directory of a share, and you don't actually need lock coherency there, then you could think about using the fileid:algorithm = fsname_norootdir option. However, I note you're using "fileid:algorithm = fsid". If that is needed for Cephfs then the fsname_norootdir option might not be appropriate. You could also consider using the fileid:nolockinode hack if it is appropriate. You should definitely read vfs_fileid(8) before...

...catches it. > > Is there any other way of translating the key to the inode? > >> >> If the contention is for the root directory of a share, and you don't >> actually need lock coherency there, then you could think about using the >> >> fileid:algorithm = fsname_norootdir >> >> option. However, I note you're using "fileid:algorithm = fsid". If >> that is needed for Cephfs then the fsname_norootdir option might not be >> appropriate. >> > > This was a leftover from a short-lived experiment with OCFS2 where I think &...

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

...B) does very badly when there is lots of contention for records. There are a few known ways of mitigating this. Looking at one example, a record containing metadata (including share mode data) for the root of a share can become very contented. This can be limited via the fileid:algorithm setting fsname_norootdir (see https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_fileid.8.html). However, before using this option you need to remember that its goal is to break lock coherency in the root of a share, so it has to be used very carefully. Another way of destroying cluster performance is to put Windows ex...

Hi, I came across the 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_LMASTER=no' and 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_RECMASTER=no' options in my quest to salvage a rather poorly performing CTDB cluster over Ceph(fs). Unfortunately, the docs provide not enough information for a clustering noop like myself. Would there be any benefit to disabling those options for a branch office node on a high-latency WAN connection?

...comparison for getxattr. o Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> * BUG 13717: lib/util: Count a trailing line that doesn't end in a newline. o Ralph Wuerthner <ralph.wuerthner at de.ibm.com> * BUG 13741: vfs_fileid: Fix get_connectpath_ino. * BUG 13744: vfs_fileid: Fix fsname_norootdir algorithm. ####################################### Reporting bugs & Development Discussion ####################################### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems th...

...comparison for getxattr. o Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> * BUG 13717: lib/util: Count a trailing line that doesn't end in a newline. o Ralph Wuerthner <ralph.wuerthner at de.ibm.com> * BUG 13741: vfs_fileid: Fix get_connectpath_ino. * BUG 13744: vfs_fileid: Fix fsname_norootdir algorithm. ####################################### Reporting bugs & Development Discussion ####################################### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems th...

...at.com> * BUG 13726: s3: net: Do not set NET_FLAGS_ANONYMOUS with -k. * BUG 13727: s3:libsmb: Honor disable_netbios option in smbsock_connect_send. o Ralph Wuerthner <ralph.wuerthner at de.ibm.com> * BUG 13741: vfs_fileid: Fix get_connectpath_ino. * BUG 13744: vfs_fileid: Fix fsname_norootdir algorithm. ####################################### Reporting bugs & Development Discussion ####################################### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems th...

...at.com> * BUG 13726: s3: net: Do not set NET_FLAGS_ANONYMOUS with -k. * BUG 13727: s3:libsmb: Honor disable_netbios option in smbsock_connect_send. o Ralph Wuerthner <ralph.wuerthner at de.ibm.com> * BUG 13741: vfs_fileid: Fix get_connectpath_ino. * BUG 13744: vfs_fileid: Fix fsname_norootdir algorithm. ####################################### Reporting bugs & Development Discussion ####################################### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems th...

...load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = lo eth0 #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [DC] path = "/mnt/use1/DC" writeable = yes browsable = yes fileid:algorithm = fsname_norootdir vfs objects = fileid shadow_copy2 acl_xattr acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes shadow:mountpoint = /mnt/use1 shadow:snapdir = /snapshots/use1 shadow:snapsharepath = DC shadow:format = %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ ---------- servers with the same configuration are running in four regions. I am suspicious o...

Superb. I'll take a look. Thank you On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:46 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:31:59 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> > wrote: > > > It seems as though, when I go from `clustering = no` to `clustering = > yes`, > > if I do a domain join, it will fail. However, if I do a