Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "fsite".
Did you mean:
site
2006 Mar 15
1
setMethod confusion -best reference for S4 programming
...ious postings but
> Stephen> don't see a fully equivalent problem-just a few
> Stephen> hints. I have been trying to set a new method for
> Stephen> the existing function "table" or
> Stephen> "as.data.frame.table" for my class "tfSites".
> Stephen> Taking out all the useful code and just returning
> Stephen> the input class I get the error
>
> >> setMethod("table", "tfSites", function(.Object) .Object)
>
> Stephen> Error in conformMethod(signature, mnames,...
2010 Jul 21
3
Interactions in GAMMs
Hi,
I've an issue adding an interaction to a GAMM:
My model was of form:
gamm1 <- gamm(TOTSR ~ fROT + s(PH) + s(LOI) + s(ASP) + s(SQRT_ELEV) + CANCOV
+ s(SQRT_TOTCWD) + s(WELLF) + s(WELLN) + s(OLDWDLD) + s(DISTWOOD) +
s(Annprec) + s(OLDWDLD:DISTWOOD) + (1|fSITE), family = poisson, data =
BIOFOR2)
with interaction of s(OLDWDLD:DISTWOOD).
However I got this error message below but don't know what it means? (my
data is composed of info for 150 plots)
#I Warning messages:
#2: In OLDWDLD:DISTWOOD :
# numerical expression has 150 elements: only the fir...
2012 Feb 22
1
Gamm and post comparison
...m looking for
activity differences between three features (4 sites per feature). I am also
looking for peaks of activity across time (Day). I am using a gamm since I
believe these are nonlinear trends with nested data.
gammdata<-gamm(lcin~Temp+s(Day)+fType+wind+fFeature+Forest+Water+Built,
list=fSite,data=data, family=gaussian)
summary(gammdata$gam)
summary(gammdata$lme)
anova(gammdata$gam)
I can see which variables are significant but I was wondering if there was a
way to do a post hoc to see differences between features? Or is there a way
to compare different models (feature) for significa...
2010 Jul 21
0
Validation in R for GAMM
My GAMM model is to find drivers of species richness in forests is
gamm1<- gamm(Total Species Richness ~ fROT + s(PH) + s(LOI) + ASP +
s(SQRT_ELEV) + CANCOV + s(SQRT_TOTCWD) + s(WELLF) + s(WELLN) +
s(OLDWDLD) + s(DISTWOOD) + s(Annprec), random=list (fSITE =~1), family
= poisson, data = BIOFOR3)
My issues are that the validation graphs are using methods I'm
unfamiliar with e.g. square rooting values and Pearson's residuals.
I'm following as best I can recommendations in Wood 2006 and Zuur 2009
but have some (I think) basic questions on g...