Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fsctl_set_spare".
Did you mean:
fsctl_set_sparse
2017 Feb 16
0
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
...o set in the share
section.
> [global]
> # ZFS SPARSE
> #share:fake_fscaps = 0
> store dos attributes = yes
> strict allocate = yes
>
> I hadn’t heard any mention of the importance of strict allocate, would that setting be wise then?
It doesn't affect how FSCTL_SET_SPARE is handled.
> What are some other tools I might try that with? I can try straight on the linux too, just as a test, if there is any tools recommended to test that with. I will also look something up for that tomorrow as well.
Let's get "fsutil.exe sparse setflag" working firs...
2017 Feb 16
4
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
Hi David,
Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it.
I then went to contig, `contig -n X:\share\sparesefile 0`, as well as a few other size. Maybe im using it wrong, but some testing on contig has only "Access is denied" when I try
2017 Feb 22
1
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
...o set in the share section.
> [global]
> # ZFS SPARSE
> #share:fake_fscaps = 0
> store dos attributes = yes
> strict allocate = yes
>
> I hadn鈥檛 heard any mention of the importance of strict allocate, would that setting be wise then?
It doesn't affect how FSCTL_SET_SPARE is handled.
> What are some other tools I might try that with? I can try straight on the linux too, just as a test, if there is any tools recommended to test that with. I will also look something up for that tomorrow as well.
Let's get "fsutil.exe sparse setflag" working firs...