Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "frowny".
Did you mean:
frown
2008 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...ondition of an equivalent restructuring of the loop in the form of a
while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that
surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the
variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this extra
scope. Frowny. -J
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Yanko" <yhdezalvarez at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:12 AM
To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: [LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while
(obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...
> mak...
2008 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously) gcc compiles it fine
Taken from tools/llvmc2/CompilationGraph.cpp:
...
for (typename C::const_iterator B = EdgesContainer.begin(),
E = EdgesContainer.end(); B != E; ++B) {
const Edge* E = B->getPtr();
...
MS C++ compiler (VS 2008) gives:
...
CompilationGraph.cpp
..\..\..\llvm\tools\llvmc2\CompilationGraph.cpp(58) : error C2371:
'E' : redefinition; different basic types
2014 Oct 06
1
OH NO, Something has gone wrong!
Hi all!
I'm setting up C7-64 as a VM using VirtualBox, on a Windows host.
as soon as I install the vbox Guest Extensions and reboot, when I log
in next time I get a white screen with a frowny face that says "Oh No,
Something has gone wrong!" and then "A problem has occurred, and the
system can't recover, please log out and try again."
Sounds like a VirtualBox problem to me, but was wondering if anyone
here had seen it and maybe knows what's going on.
Thanks...
2008 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...alent restructuring of the loop in the form of a
> while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope that
> surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the
> variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this extra
> scope. Frowny. -J
>
Actually, gcc is wrong and VC++ got it right.
From the C++ standard, 6.4p3:
> A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced
> by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the
> condition) is in scope from its point of declaration until the end of
&...
2008 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...lent restructuring of the loop in the form of a
> while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope
> that
> surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the
> variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this extra
> scope. Frowny. -J
This can be changed in the project settings for a VC++ project. I think it
was called something like "Enforce for loop conformance" or so...
This is something I always change though.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llv...
2008 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...loop in the form of a
> > while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope
> that
> > surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the
> > variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this
> extra
> > scope. Frowny. -J
> >
>
> Actually, gcc is wrong and VC++ got it right.
> From the C++ standard, 6.4p3:
>
> > A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced
> > by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the
> > condition) is in scope from its point...
2008 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] MS C++ gives error C2371 on this code while (obviously)gcc compiles it fine
...in the form of a
>> while statement, which in turn fronts the declaration to an extra scope
>> that
>> surrounds the /entire/ loop construct. VC++ seems to be scoping the
>> variables as if they were /inside/ of the loop and not creating this
>> extra
>> scope. Frowny. -J
>>
>
> Actually, gcc is wrong and VC++ got it right.
> From the C++ standard, 6.4p3:
>
>> A name introduced by a declaration in a condition (either introduced
>> by the type-specifier-seq or the declarator of the
>> condition) is in scope from its point of de...
2012 Jan 04
1
DAHDI-Linux 2.6.0 and DAHDI-Tools 2.6.0 Released
...changes
wct4xxp: Handle incorrect vpm module/card pairings
wct4xxp: minor: Removed unnecessary instrumentation
wct4xxp: Expose serial number in dahdi_device and kernel log.
wct4xxp: Add field upgradable firmware support for TE820.
wcte12xp, wctdm24xxp: Remove frowny face from vpmoct032 error message
Oron Peled:
xpp: BRI: batch D-Channel packets to fix frag.
xpp: BRI: split multibyte functionality
xpp: BRI: remove trivial BRISTUFF wrappers
xpp: BRI: remove legacy BRISTUFF code
xpp: bad module_put() when too many Astrib...
2012 Jan 04
1
DAHDI-Linux 2.6.0 and DAHDI-Tools 2.6.0 Released
...changes
wct4xxp: Handle incorrect vpm module/card pairings
wct4xxp: minor: Removed unnecessary instrumentation
wct4xxp: Expose serial number in dahdi_device and kernel log.
wct4xxp: Add field upgradable firmware support for TE820.
wcte12xp, wctdm24xxp: Remove frowny face from vpmoct032 error message
Oron Peled:
xpp: BRI: batch D-Channel packets to fix frag.
xpp: BRI: split multibyte functionality
xpp: BRI: remove trivial BRISTUFF wrappers
xpp: BRI: remove legacy BRISTUFF code
xpp: bad module_put() when too many Astrib...