search for: fropm

...get way out of hand. >> >> This list is not a place for legal advise .. let's let the attorneys who >> actually know the law and the maintainers of programs decide what >> license they use and what it means. > > Could you explain why you did not reply to the mail fropm Chris Adams who > introduced a false claim about so called "opinions of a number of lawyers"? > > As mentioned: lawyers explain why there is no problem with ZFS integration. If > you don't like useless discussions, you need to prevent people from spreading > unverif...

On 06/01/2015 06:42 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > >> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is >> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the >> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? > > There is no licensing issue, but

...gt; Sometimes these things get way out of hand. > > This list is not a place for legal advise .. let's let the attorneys who > actually know the law and the maintainers of programs decide what > license they use and what it means. Could you explain why you did not reply to the mail fropm Chris Adams who introduced a false claim about so called "opinions of a number of lawyers"? As mentioned: lawyers explain why there is no problem with ZFS integration. If you don't like useless discussions, you need to prevent people from spreading unverified rumors. J?rg -- E...

Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > Could you explain why you did not reply to the mail fropm Chris Adams who > > introduced a false claim about so called "opinions of a number of lawyers"? > > > > As mentioned: lawyers explain why there is no problem with ZFS integration. If > > you don't like useless discussions, you need to prevent people from spr...