search for: frontiers

...grid2" of function "frontier" as "gridDouble" * renamed argument "iprint" of function "frontier" as "printIter" * removed arguments "qxNames" and "quadHalf" from function "frontier", because quadratic or translog frontiers can be estimated with function "frontierQuad" now * added "logLik" method for objects of class "frontier" * added function "frontierQuad" for estimating quadratic and translog frontiers * added function "frontierTranslogRay" for estimating stoch...

...grid2" of function "frontier" as "gridDouble" * renamed argument "iprint" of function "frontier" as "printIter" * removed arguments "qxNames" and "quadHalf" from function "frontier", because quadratic or translog frontiers can be estimated with function "frontierQuad" now * added "logLik" method for objects of class "frontier" * added function "frontierQuad" for estimating quadratic and translog frontiers * added function "frontierTranslogRay" for estimating stoch...

Reading the LLVM Programmer's Manual, the description of DenseSet mentions: *Note that DenseSet has the same requirements for the value type that DenseMap <http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#dss_densemap> has.* But when I read about DenseMap, I don't really see any requirements for the values, just a warning about space. On the other hand, the *keys* have special

Hi! A few weeks ago, I have uploaded a new R package "frontier" for Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) [1] to CRAN [2]. It includes the FORTRAN code of Tim Coelli's [3] software "Frontier 4.1" [4]. Hence, the R package "frontier" should have the same capabilities as "Frontier 4.1", i.e. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production

Hi! A few weeks ago, I have uploaded a new R package "frontier" for Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) [1] to CRAN [2]. It includes the FORTRAN code of Tim Coelli's [3] software "Frontier 4.1" [4]. Hence, the R package "frontier" should have the same capabilities as "Frontier 4.1", i.e. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production

Hi, I found that LLVM 3.1 says Dominance frontier is deprecated. Can anyone please tell me, if there is any replacement for Dominance frontier & Postdominance frontier in LLVM? What are the options if we need to use them? Thanks, Swarup. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am trying to find out the scale efficiency and optimal scale of banks by stochastic frontier analysis given the panel data of bank. I am free to choose any model of stochastic frontier analysis. The only approach I know to work with R is to estimate a translog production function by sfa or other related function in frontier package, and then use the Ray 1998 formula to find the scale

My problem was that the constructor for DenseMap has an undocumented constraint. explicit DenseMap(unsigned NumInitBuckets = 0) { init(NumInitBuckets); } if given an explicit argument, requires that the argument be a power of 2. It's checked by an assert in init(), but for some reason my code didn't trip the assertion. Is there a special way I must make to enable asserts? Thanks,

In the literature (see below for a reference), when a dominance frontier is computed, it is computed from a CFG that contains a dummy entry node and dummy exit node. Further, those dummy nodes are potential members of the (post-)dominance frontier for a given basic block. In LLVM, I could not figure out a way to determine if the dummy entry node is a member of the post-dominance frontier of

I need to estimate maximum tree crown radius and am looking for a package to prepare stochastic frontier models in R. I have not found any package references on Nabble R help, google, or R help. Any tips on a package for this? With regards, Aaron Trowbridge Researcher BV Research Centre Smithers B.C. -- View this message in context:

On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: Sorry I never responded to this: > In the literature (see below for a reference), when a dominance frontier > is computed, it is computed from a CFG that contains a dummy entry node > and dummy exit node. Further, those dummy nodes are potential members > of the (post-)dominance frontier for a given basic block. In LLVM, I > could not

Hello. I'm using Samba 3.0.25a on FreeBSD-6.0. Samba is configured to be a PDC. Samba can't find its hostname via nmblookup: $ nmblookup -B 192.168.1.255 frontier querying frontier on 192.168.1.255 name_query failed to find name frontier If I query Samba via unicast, it answers OK: $ nmblookup -U frontier frontier querying frontier on 192.168.1.31 192.168.1.31 frontier<00> Also,

Hello everybody, Anyone familiar with the package frontier? I have some general questions on how to approach the model design. Thanks in advance Giovanna Giovanna Ottaviani Aalmo Stipendiat/Ph.D. Student ------------------------------------------- Norsk institutt for skog og landskap Pb 115, NO-1431 Ås T (+47) 64 94 9094 M(+47) 980 30 422 F(+47) 64 94 90 80

Dear all I am happy to announce that version 1.0 of the "frontier" package is available on CRAN. The R package "frontier" provides tools for analysing efficiency and productivity using the "stochastic frontier" approach. This R package is based on Tim Coelli's DOS software "FRONTIER 4.1" and has been available on CRAN for almost 5 years now. After many

Hi Henrique, I have tried using -mergereturn and inserting a free into the predecessors of dominance frontier of malloc block and it caused double free. It is possible for multiple free's to be inserted on the path from malloc to an exit. For example, in the following CFG: BB10 (malloc) / \ BB11 BB12 ... / \ / \

Try breaking the critical edges (-break-crit-edges). This way, a new block will be created between BB13 and BB11 (call this BB11.break) and BB15 and BB12 (call this BB12.break). The predecessors of the dominance frontier will, thus, be BB11.break, BB12.break, and BB14. When we enter through a block with a call to malloc(), we will end up in one of the blocks in the dominance frontier (kind of).

Am I missing a Package? I'm not sure why is won't read the functions. Any help is much appreciated. > PData = Data[,3:10] > Spec = portfolioSpec() Error: could not find function "portfolioSpec" > setTargetReturn(Spec) = mean(colMeans(PData)) Error in setTargetReturn(Spec) = mean(colMeans(PData)) : object 'Spec' not found > Constraints =

...Guys, I saw in the API that DominanceFrontier has been deprecated. Is this for real? I have read the computational issues but shouldn't that be left to the users of llvm? My concern is I am writing a Control Dependence module that uses Dominance-Frontier information. Getting rid of Dominance Frontiers will put me in a tight spot. George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120820/5d8cc525/attachment.html>

I just finished upgrading our LLVM to 2.4 and I immediately ran into a problem with dominance frontier calculation: llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:714: void llvm::PMDataManager::verifyDomInfo(llvm::Pass&, llvm::Function&): Assertion `0 && "Invalid dominator info"' failed. Strangely enough, the Pass running when the assert triggers is Dominance Frontier

Dear all, I want to program my own models about Stochastic Frontier Analysis and Linear programming (Data Envelopment Analysis). In this context, is there anyone that may help me with some simple tutorials and scripts about these issues? Thanks a lot. -- Marcus Vinicius Pereira de Souza, Prof. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]