search for: fronth

...ly or one wouldn't get any merging benefit. > > My point is that you can use two git repositories, each one tracking one > svn repo, and move revisions from one to another. I never tried it so No, we can't. Git doesn't work that way. Git uses a set of repositories all cloned fronth each other. One can't simply merge from one arbitrary git repository to another. >>> The difficult part is not on LLVM's using svn, the problem is on you >>> using svn. >> >> Umm...that's more than a bit off-putting, thanks. > > Sorry, thas was not...

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: >> (Upstream) svn <--> git-svn <--> git-svn <--> svn (Downstream) > > I asked about both to the git guys. They said it isn't supported. > Double-ended git-svn just won't work, period. You can't do it because a > git branch is still tied to the revision numbering of the first git-svn > gateway

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> I can't use git-svn to pull because we use svn on our end. One can't do >> this: >> >> (Upstream) svn <--> git-svn <--> git <--> git-svn <--> svn (Downstream) >> >> because the revisions in the two svn repositories