search for: fronend

Is there some simple textual frontend to the ManageSieve protocol somewhat easier to use than gnutls-cli? I.e. something to use like managesieve -u ef putscript myscript < /tmp/myscript Password: managesieve -u ef setactive myscript Password: simply doing the TLS authentication and length computation for me.

Hi, Is there any php or other web (not cli) front end (same as omega) for Xapian index? I would like to use Xapian for an intranet search portal, and modify the style of it. Many thanks, Omer

Thanks Chris. I'll follow any ongoing discussion about this. Unless I'm missing something, customizable widths for integer types is necessary to achieve source-level compatibility with existing cross-compilers. It would be great to see the fronend being parameterized by integer widths at runtime. There would be no noticable loss of efficiency and this would avoid the obnoxious and error-prone situation of keeping many C frontends sitting around. FWIW CIL just lately became parameterizable at runtime with machine-specific information an...

...hr wrote: > Thanks Chris. I'll follow any ongoing discussion about this. > Unless I'm > missing something, customizable widths for integer types is > necessary to > achieve source-level compatibility with existing cross-compilers. > > It would be great to see the fronend being parameterized by integer > widths > at runtime. There would be no noticable loss of efficiency and this > would > avoid the obnoxious and error-prone situation of keeping many C > frontends > sitting around. > > FWIW CIL just lately became parameterizable at run...

...types. However, from the > standpoint of a frontend, this is not a great concern, because the > frontend will most likely sort the list of types before constructing the > IR type. Hm... it's placing a burden on the frontend developer. More importantly, it's something that the fronend developer must not forget to do, so you better make sure this is documented in capital letters in a place where the frontend developer is likely to look when preparing code generation. Most importantly, however, this will create a lot of hassles when making code interoperable between compilers...

Hello. How are the things going with the llvm-gcc for SPARC and Solaris OS? I have discovered recently the fact, that the code is still in the "patches welcome" stage and is far even from being successfully built on SPARC. I would like to know, if anyone maintaining this code, what is the current to-do list, etc. I would like to offer my help for gcc front-end on SPARC project. --

Although the process of porting the LLVM backend to a new architecture looks pretty straightforward (and is very well documented) there's a frontend issue that I'm not clear on: How do we to tell the frontend about implementation-defined constants like integer width? In other words, when llvm-gcc does a promote-to-integer operation, this acts differently if the target architecture

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, John Regehr wrote: > Although the process of porting the LLVM backend to a new architecture > looks pretty straightforward (and is very well documented) there's a > frontend issue that I'm not clear on: > > How do we to tell the frontend about implementation-defined constants > like integer width? In other words, when llvm-gcc does a >

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:25 PM, me22 <me22.ca at gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/1/14 Talin <viridia at gmail.com>: > > The reason for doing it this way is that to construct a union, you really > > need 4 pieces of information: The type of the union, the type and value > of > > the member to be initialized, and the index of which member is being > >

2010/1/14 Talin <viridia at gmail.com>: > The reason for doing it this way is that to construct a union, you really > need 4 pieces of information: The type of the union, the type and value of > the member to be initialized, and the index of which member is being > initialized. Does requiring the index mean that uniquing the union type will have to re-write many of the

...tandpoint of a >> frontend, this is not a great concern, because the frontend will most likely >> sort the list of types before constructing the IR type. >> > > Hm... it's placing a burden on the frontend developer. > > More importantly, it's something that the fronend developer must not forget > to do, so you better make sure this is documented in capital letters in a > place where the frontend developer is likely to look when preparing code > generation. > > Most importantly, however, this will create a lot of hassles when making > code intero...

...kend/vif/2/0 ^Mmac is 00:16:3e:61:e0:fb ^M************************** ^M[main] IP 9302cf2c netmask ffff0000 gateway 0. ^M[main] TCP/IP bringup begins. ^MThread "tcpip_thread": pointer: 0x82004190, stack: 0x480000 ^M[tcpip_thread] TCP/IP bringup ends. ^M[main] Network is ready. ^MIniting FS fronend(s). ^MFS export [dom=0, id=0] found ^MInitialising FS fortend to backend dom 0 ^MAllocating request array for import 0, nr_entries = 128. ^MOur own id is 2 ^MBackend found at /local/domain/0/backend/vfs/0 ^MBackend ready. ^Mdom vm is at /vm/345a524f-1139-9722-f455-a643e8f95d5a ^M"main" &q...