search for: fromservers

Ive recently inherited an old samba installation which was originally migrated from a windows 2003 server. It was running samba 4.2.13 so i upgraded to 4.6.4. All is well and everything appears to be working correctly but get the following error error when running the db check tool: Fix replPropertyMetaData on CN=f37883ec-90f7-4ac3-b478-00a266e31f83,CN=NTDS

Hi All, On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable to fix.. Any hints? * Basic dbcheck is clean. [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 327 objects Checked 327 objects (0 errors) * Cross-NCS shows two errors related to a de-comissionned DC (dc02) and cannot auto-fix this.. How do I fix

Hi Stefan I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch to fix the bug. I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba 4.7.4. Whenever I run samba-tool drs replicate --fix --yes command on the DC it shows the below errors which cannot be fixed: Failed to remove deleted DN attribute fromServer : (65, "objectclass_attrs: at

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) > "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 >> and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable >> to

Hi Harsh, sorry, but you're problem is not related to my patches. This may need further investigation. metze Am 31.01.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Harsh Kukreja: > Hi Stefan > > I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch > to fix the bug. > > I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba > 4.7.4. Whenever

Hi I am running samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes command on my DC running 4.7.4 to remove the Deleted and Stale records which is failing Target GUID points at deleted DN '<GUID=3484ea7a-da88-4269-9b32-55a9c7faabf6>;CN=NTDS

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 > and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable > to fix.. Any hints? > > * Basic dbcheck is clean. > > [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool

Hi, here're patches to avoid a database corruption with linked attributes, e.g. member/memberOf. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13228 As a temporary solution admins can add "server services = -kcc" to the global section of smb.conf. Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! "Remove duplicate links in attribute" and "ERROR:

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:19:10 -0500 (EST) "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) > > "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >>

Hello all- I am trying to upgrade a old domain to a newer version. The old DCs are a custom compiled version of Samba, so instead of upgrading the DCs in place, the plan is to upgrade by joining new DCs to the domain, replicating data and then shutting down the old ones after transferring the FSMO roles. I had the new DC (dc3, version 4.9.4-12) replicating to the other DCs (dc0, versions

hi, I have this DC in aws to fulfill the authentication need of our moodle. # samba -V Version 4.17.7-Debian DNS with SAMBA_INTERNAL The replication of the users and groups happens correctly. Some errors in running samba_dnsupdate, but it is ok anyway. When I ran the command samba-tool dbcheck, I got the return below. # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes

Hi all, some background : ===== recently I had to cleanup a network of 1 DC on main office and 5 RODC on remote location. On one RODC for some reason there where still ntdsConnection objects with fromServer attribute pointing to servers GUID that do not exists anymore. Those fromServer attribute with spurious guid can be seen with ldbsearch but cannot be seen through ldap connexion, so I

While this should work, neither is this particularly harmful. ?Links to objects that don't exist are ignored at runtime. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 14:39 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > hi, > > Any clue? > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:17?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > I have this DC in aws to

----- On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:35 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > I wonder if this has anything to do with the 'you cannot upgrade > directly from 4.7.x to 4.9.x' bug ? I was not aware of this bug. Do you think I should scrap this upgrade and try again jumping like so? 4.0.6-12 -> 4.7 -> 4.8 -> 4.9 > I know this might seem strange, but try running

Hi Denis Thanks for your response without your crystal ball. I have increased the log level =9 dns:0 on both the servers. It replicates successfully by manually running the command samba-tool drs replicate SERVER2 SERVER1 dc=iumnet,dc=edu,dc=na --full-sync but it is still failing when I check from the samba-tool drs showrepl Also I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix on both the servers

Are use using zarafaAccount=1 withing the search filters? I use this things like this : (&(objectClass=person)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) Or for groups. (&(objectclass=group)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) That helps a lot. ! If you switch to kopano beware to change the SCHEMA and filters zarafaAccount changed to kopanoAccount Greetz. Louis

On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:04:50 -0600 (CST) Mike Ray via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to upgrade a old domain to a newer version. The old DCs > are a custom compiled version of Samba, so instead of upgrading the > DCs in place, the plan is to upgrade by joining new DCs to the > domain, replicating data and then shutting down the old

...tings has mistake? What logic to choose outgoing transport? [transport-udp] type=transport bind=0.0.0.0:5070 protocol=udp [srv_d228] type=endpoint language=ru rtp_symmetric=yes force_rport=yes disable_direct_media_on_nat=yes rewrite_contact=yes ice_support=yes disallow=all allow=alaw context=ext-fromservers from_domain=sipnet.ru from_user=talk37.ru aors=srv_d228 auth=srv_d228 set_var=fromDeviceId=228 set_var=fromUserId=2 outbound_auth=srv_d228 ;outbound_proxy=sip:sipnet.ru:5060 transport=transport-udp [srv_d228] type=aor qualify_frequency=30 contact=sip:sipnet.ru:5060 ;outbound_proxy=sip:sipnet.ru:50...

Dear users, We are facing to a big latency issue regarding the LDAP Server (both encrypted & plain). We have a Zarafa mail server which makes a lot of queries and puts a samba process to 100% usage. This latency makes the mail server unusable.. The mail server was previously on OpenLDAP and there was not performance issues. A simple LDAP query can take up to 25 sec to perform !! We

Can you tell more about your setup? Is zarafa and samba on the same server for example. Which MTA are you using postfix/exim?   My top was about 150 users, and all my printers are connected also so about 200 devices do ldap searches. but my setup is split over 10+ servers ( 2 are AD DC )   So best is to tell what you can about your setup, anonimize if needed.   Greetz,   Louis