search for: frobbing

Railsters: I have finally gotten back to Rails, and I''m having the usual "a little bit too flexible for your own good" problems. Specifically, the above in my Haml renders this: <a href="/thang/frob" data-remote="true">Frob</a> I need href=''#'' and an Ajax call. What did I do wrong? (Besides, ahem, attempt to read the fine

Bill, I believe the empty-exception-specification example is a red- herring, but that if you can construct an example where you think a landing-pad requires multiple filter lists then I think we can then have a productive conversation about it. I believe we can only get multiple filter lists in a landing-pad if we attempt to merge exception-regions, and since filters are only an

On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > I believe the empty-exception-specification example is a red-herring, > but that if you can construct an example where you think a landing-pad > requires multiple filter lists then I think we can then have a productive > conversation about it. > > I believe we can only get multiple filter lists in a

hey, i am using the flickr wrapper for ruby and need to access the tags of a specific photo. i got all the rest working. i must admit i am kind of new to ruby, but i tried and tried and couldn''t figure it out. among other things i want to read geotags like in my example here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whoisstan/146634506/ i''m sure it is deadsimple and i just overlooked it.

How can I do this?: foo { name: $bar => "frob" } define foo( $bar = false, $baz = false ) { if #$bar and $baz both defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar --baz=$baz ${name}" else if #$bar defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar ${name}" else if #$baz defined $cmd = "frobnicate --baz=$baz ${name}" else

I put invoke/unwind aside because I couldn't get them to work, but I'm working on my evaluator now and it would be nice to figure this out so I don't have to unwind the stack manually. This was the reason for my earlier question about global declarations, and as that's cleared up I can easily pass exception data...if I can make unwind return out of some deep recursion. The

Bill, ooops, yes, I described the meaning of "throw(A)" backwards, but I still think my example shows why you cannot merge LandingpadInst while inlining because multiple filter-lists on a LandingpadInst don't make sense. Perhaps I'm reading your original spec wrong, perhaps I'm mis-reading Duncan's emails, but I read them to mean that your syntax supports

On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > I suspect we're talking about two different aspects, > I think you are saying that there is an ability for the DWARF Actions Table > to contain multiple lists, including multiple filter lists - no disagreement > there, > I am saying that for any one landing-pad it might not make sense > for it to be able

Hi, I met a problem when I binding JAVA. 1. download xapian-bindings-0.9.10.tar.gz to my local. 2. unzip binding file. 3. input ./configure --with-java in cygwin. 4 give me error: checking for java... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/java checking for javac... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/javac checking for jar... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/jar

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:40:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This is the results from: > make C=1 CHECK="/path/to/smatch -p=kernel" bzImage modules | tee warns.txt > grep -w overflow warns.txt | uniq -f 3 | tee err-list > > I hacked on the buffer overflow check last weekend and these are the > results. It has way more false positives than the other bug

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 05/14/2017 11:06 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> On 03/01/2017 05:30 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> So, https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32056 is an example

Bill, I suspect we're talking about two different aspects, I think you are saying that there is an ability for the DWARF Actions Table to contain multiple lists, including multiple filter lists - no disagreement there, I am saying that for any one landing-pad it might not make sense for it to be able to have more than one filter list. -Peter Lawrence. On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:38

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 03/01/2017 05:30 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: > > So, https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32056 is an example showing our > current TBAA tree for union generation is definitely irretrievably broken. > I'll be honest here. I'm pretty sure your proposal doesn't go far

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask, > * doing a speculative memory access. > */ > if (info->freed_tables) { > - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > - (void *)info, 1); > + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask, > * doing a speculative memory access. > */ > if (info->freed_tables) { > - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > - (void *)info, 1); > + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,

Hi, I've added kate support to liboggplay (a prerequisite to getting kate tracks to work with the mozilla plugin, which I've now got working on Linux). In addition to the Kate code: - a new oggplay-uninstalled.pc file - configure.ac checks for C++ compiler - no check for fishsound version - it wanted 0.8.0, but the svn itself was 0.7.1 !? - don't use imlib2 (nor dump-first-frame) if

We need to write the irq number to GICC_DIR on the physical cpu that previously received the interrupt, but currently we are doing it on the pcpu that received the maintenance interrupt. As a consequence if a vcpu is migrated to a different pcpu, the irq is going to be EOI''ed on the wrong pcpu. This covers the case where dom0 vcpu0 is running on pcpu1 for example (you can test this

Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select): >> + return proxy->device_feature_select; > > Oh dear no... Please use defines like the rest of QEMU. It is pretty ugly. Yet the structure definitions are descriptive,

Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select): >> + return proxy->device_feature_select; > > Oh dear no... Please use defines like the rest of QEMU. It is pretty ugly. Yet the structure definitions are descriptive,

So, https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32056 is an example showing our current TBAA tree for union generation is definitely irretrievably broken. I'll be honest here. I'm pretty sure your proposal doesn't go far enough. But truthfully, I would rather see us come closer to a representation we know works, which is GCC's. Let me try to simplify what you are suggesting, and what we