search for: frob

Railsters: I have finally gotten back to Rails, and I''m having the usual "a little bit too flexible for your own good" problems. Specifically, the above in my Haml renders this: <a href="/thang/frob" data-remote="true">Frob</a> I need href=''#'' and an Ajax call. What did I do wrong? (Besides, ahem, attempt to read the fine manual?) I have to use Rails 3.0.8, BTW... -- Phlip http://zeekland.zeroplayer.com/Uncle_Wiggilys_Travels/1 -- You receive...

...t to merge exception-regions, and since filters are only an outer-function concept (not an inner try-statement concept) this can only come about from function inlining. so say we're considering inlining "void foo() throw(A) { ... }" into "void bar() throw (B) {... foo(); ... ; frob(); ...}" if you attempt to merge the landing pad for these functions (perhaps assuming it is going to be simple because there are no cleanups in either function that would complicate things) then... there has to be a filter for A that will terminate the program if A is thrown, but you ca...

...ons, and since filters are only an outer-function > concept (not an inner try-statement concept) this can only come about > from function inlining. > > so say we're considering inlining "void foo() throw(A) { ... }" into > "void bar() throw (B) {... foo(); ... ; frob(); ...}" > > if you attempt to merge the landing pad for these functions (perhaps > assuming it is going to be simple because there are no cleanups in either > function that would complicate things) then... > > there has to be a filter for A that will terminate the program...

hey, i am using the flickr wrapper for ruby and need to access the tags of a specific photo. i got all the rest working. i must admit i am kind of new to ruby, but i tried and tried and couldn''t figure it out. among other things i want to read geotags like in my example here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whoisstan/146634506/ i''m sure it is deadsimple and i just overlooked it.

How can I do this?: foo { name: $bar => "frob" } define foo( $bar = false, $baz = false ) { if #$bar and $baz both defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar --baz=$baz ${name}" else if #$bar defined $cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar ${name}" else if #$baz defined $cmd = "frobnicate...

...rns every time if done one level deep in the same translation unit. If I try it across translation units, or more than one call deep, I get a seg fault every time. I have reduced the problem to a trivial test case which I can post if there is an obvious "you idiot, everyone knows you have to frob your gismoids" answer. Dustin

...y an outer- >> function >> concept (not an inner try-statement concept) this can only come about >> from function inlining. >> >> so say we're considering inlining "void foo() throw(A) { ... }" into >> "void bar() throw (B) {... foo(); ... ; frob(); ...}" >> >> if you attempt to merge the landing pad for these functions (perhaps >> assuming it is going to be simple because there are no cleanups in >> either >> function that would complicate things) then... >> >> there has to be a filter for A...

On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Bill, > I suspect we're talking about two different aspects, > I think you are saying that there is an ability for the DWARF Actions Table > to contain multiple lists, including multiple filter lists - no disagreement > there, > I am saying that for any one landing-pad it might not make sense > for it to be able

Hi, I met a problem when I binding JAVA. 1. download xapian-bindings-0.9.10.tar.gz to my local. 2. unzip binding file. 3. input ./configure --with-java in cygwin. 4 give me error: checking for java... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/java checking for javac... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/javac checking for jar... /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.5.0_11/bin/jar

...gt; 112 for (min = 1; min <= MAXBITS; min++) > 113 if (count[min] != 0) break; > 114 if (root < min) root = min; > smatch thinks "min" can be MAXBITS here. > > One bad thing is that if you have code like: > if (foo == 42) > frob(); > Smatch thinks that "foo" can be 43 after the if statement. > > The format is: > file.c +<line> function(<lines into function>) warning 'array_name' <array size> <= <offset> > > regards, > dan carpenter > > Previous bug...

...gt;> >> Our metadata has no child links, and only a single parent link. >> >> You can't represent the above form because you can't make a single short >> node a child of every union/struct it needs to be (lack of multiple >> parents means you can't just frob them all to offset zero). >> >> Your suggestion is to invert this as a struct >> >> short int >> | / >> union >> >> We don't allow multiple parents, however. >> Because of that, you suggest we follow all nodes for unions, special >...

Bill, I suspect we're talking about two different aspects, I think you are saying that there is an ability for the DWARF Actions Table to contain multiple lists, including multiple filter lists - no disagreement there, I am saying that for any one landing-pad it might not make sense for it to be able to have more than one filter list. -Peter Lawrence. On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:38

...avoid representing it. > > Our metadata has no child links, and only a single parent link. > > You can't represent the above form because you can't make a single short > node a child of every union/struct it needs to be (lack of multiple > parents means you can't just frob them all to offset zero). > > Your suggestion is to invert this as a struct > > short int > | / > union > > We don't allow multiple parents, however. > Because of that, you suggest we follow all nodes for unions, special > casing union-type nodes somehow &gt...

...} > - smp_call_function_many(cond_cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > + __smp_call_function_many(cond_cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > + flush_tlb_func_local, > (void *)info, 1); > } > } Do we really need that _local/_remote distinction? ISTR you had a patch that frobbed flush_tlb_info into the csd and that gave space constraints, but I'm not seeing that here (probably a wise, get stuff merged etc..). struct __call_single_data { struct llist_node llist; /* 0 8 */ smp_call_func_t func;...

...} > - smp_call_function_many(cond_cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > + __smp_call_function_many(cond_cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote, > + flush_tlb_func_local, > (void *)info, 1); > } > } Do we really need that _local/_remote distinction? ISTR you had a patch that frobbed flush_tlb_info into the csd and that gave space constraints, but I'm not seeing that here (probably a wise, get stuff merged etc..). struct __call_single_data { struct llist_node llist; /* 0 8 */ smp_call_func_t func;...

...te code: - a new oggplay-uninstalled.pc file - configure.ac checks for C++ compiler - no check for fishsound version - it wanted 0.8.0, but the svn itself was 0.7.1 !? - don't use imlib2 (nor dump-first-frame) if it isn't here (I didn't have this when I started hacking on liboggplay) - frob the CFLAGS/LIBS in Makefile.am to make it build for me (you want to look at this and only pick what seems correct to you, as I'm hazy on that one) - oggplay_set_track_inactive is now exposed in the API (I needed this to switch kate tracks on the fly in the browser plugin) Cheers -------------...

We need to write the irq number to GICC_DIR on the physical cpu that previously received the interrupt, but currently we are doing it on the pcpu that received the maintenance interrupt. As a consequence if a vcpu is migrated to a different pcpu, the irq is going to be EOI''ed on the wrong pcpu. This covers the case where dom0 vcpu0 is running on pcpu1 for example (you can test this

...tc. in the kernel headers or qemu? > Haven't looked at the proposed new ring layout yet. No change, but there's an open question on whether we should nail it to little endian (or define the endian by the transport). Of course, I can't rule out that the 1.0 standard *may* decide to frob the ring layout somehow, but I'd think it would require a compelling reason. I suggest that's 2.0 material... Cheers, Rusty.

...tc. in the kernel headers or qemu? > Haven't looked at the proposed new ring layout yet. No change, but there's an open question on whether we should nail it to little endian (or define the endian by the transport). Of course, I can't rule out that the 1.0 standard *may* decide to frob the ring layout somehow, but I'd think it would require a compelling reason. I suggest that's 2.0 material... Cheers, Rusty.

...for C/C++ is char) just to avoid representing it. Our metadata has no child links, and only a single parent link. You can't represent the above form because you can't make a single short node a child of every union/struct it needs to be (lack of multiple parents means you can't just frob them all to offset zero). Your suggestion is to invert this as a struct short int | / union We don't allow multiple parents, however. Because of that, you suggest we follow all nodes for unions, special casing union-type nodes somehow Let me suggest something different: We know the...