Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "frnkzk".
Did you mean:
frnak
1999 Jun 04
0
Forw: 2.2.x kernel vulnerability
...3.24.239)
by lists.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 1999 07:39:37 -0000
Received: from mizar.firestar.dhs.org (root@[129.2.179.251])
by mail.redhat.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA00151
for <linux-security@redhat.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 02:51:41 -0400
Received: from arcturus.firestar.dhs.org (frnkzk@arcturus.firestar.dhs.org [129.2.178.19])
by mizar.firestar.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA02539;
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 02:50:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from frnkzk@localhost)
by arcturus.firestar.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA02329;
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 02:52:11 -0400
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 02:52:10...
1999 Jun 07
2
RedHat 6.0, /dev/pts permissions bug when using xterm (fwd)
[Mod: forwarded from BUGTRAQ -- alex]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 19:15:05 +0000
From: noc-wage <wage@IDIRECT.CA>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
Subject: RedHat 6.0, /dev/pts permissions bug when using xterm
Once again I''ve come up with another trivial Denial of Service flaw,
(wow,
I seem to be good at this Conseal Firewall, +++ath0, ppp byte-stuffing)