Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "frimley".
Did you mean:
grimley
2013 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PROPOSAL] per-function optimization level control
...Clang builds don't have
optimization turned up so high as on some other compilers.
--
John Dallman
-----------------
Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
Registered number: 3476850.
Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD.
2013 Jun 13
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PROPOSAL] per-function optimization level control
...zation turned up so high as on some other compilers.
>
> --
> John Dallman
> -----------------
> Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
> Registered number: 3476850.
> Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2013 May 29
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PROPOSAL] per-function optimization level control
In reply to the question about what would be the common use case:
> What is the common use case? Making sure some funtion is always
> optimized or making sure it never optimized? If the second one, I
> wonder if marking it cold would be a good enough approximation.
Although both cases would be nice and our users have expressed some
interest in both, the critical one is the second case
2013 Jun 13
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [PROPOSAL] per-function optimization level control
...on some other compilers.
>>
>> --
>> John Dallman
>> -----------------
>> Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
>> Registered number: 3476850.
>> Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> _______________________________________________...
2013 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Meaning of LLVM optimization levels
...ich is not trivial, but could be done. Does anyone have a strong opinion about this?
cheers,
--renato
-----------------
Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
Registered number: 3476850.
Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130607/008c1457/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 07
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Meaning of LLVM optimization levels
Of course it's *possible*, in a fundamental sense. It's even pretty easy to get right in a compiler back end (in a conceptual sense). You have to touch a LOT of code, but all the changes are trivial. We did this at Tartan Labs back in the 90s. Done with only a bit of care, it makes debugging possible at any optimization level. The idea is to make the debug information reflect what the
2013 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Meaning of LLVM optimization levels
...very topic. I agree that it would be extremely helpful for debugging large programs.
cheers,
--renato
-----------------
Siemens Industry Software Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales.
Registered number: 3476850.
Registered office: Faraday House, Sir William Siemens Square, Frimley, Surrey, GU16 8QD.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130607/cc28921c/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Meaning of LLVM optimization levels
On 7 June 2013 13:53, Dallman, John <john.dallman at siemens.com> wrote:
> It needs to be possible to debug code at any optimisation level.
>
Yes, I agree. But after O1, sequential execution is a big impediment for
optimizations, and keeping the debug information valid after so many
transformations might pose a big penalty on the passes (time & memory).
That was the whole idea
2013 Jun 06
4
[LLVMdev] Meaning of LLVM optimization levels
Folks,
I'm trying to rationalize about optimization levels and maybe we should
come up with a document like this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
Though, I remember a discussion a few months ago, and some people
recommended we had names, rather than numbers, to dissociate the idea that
3 is better than 2. Regardless, would be good to have some guidelines on
what goes