search for: frictional

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote: > > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was > > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list. > > Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as >

On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, and often intimidating for newcomers > > > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use multiple avenues of communication, it’s *really* hard to imagine email as a *mechanism*

Recently there's been some friction over reversions (I can remember two cases in recent memory). In both issues the general feel I got is that as a community we should honor "revert for more design review" requests unconditionally. What do you guys think of adding something like this to DeveloperPolicy.rst as an item at the end of the numbered list in

Rpvs> On 04/09/2020 19:02, Gregory Sloop wrote: >> Re: [Samba] SID mapping: Samba and SSSD >> *Rpvs> On 03/09/2020 22:35, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> >>>> Happy to review if you write it :-).

On Oct 5, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 October 2014 07:19, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: >> So with that in mind, I would like to ask, would it be possible to consider >> switching to LLVM style for lld? > > We don't usually enforce code styles on side projects because it > doesn't

> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> > wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> >> > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> About two months ago I posted a patch that hoisted the hottest case >> >> statement from a switch statement during

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 03/09/2020 21:15, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > >>> > >>> There is an sssd provided idmapper (on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora) it is > >>> packaged

The build failed. See http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com/builds/RubyOnRails/6553 for details. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi all, I've been using -ftime-trace on the compiler and find it very useful for analysing compile times and whole build times. I've made a first attempt at adding this to LLD (ELF) so link times can be traced in the same way: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69043 This works for LTO and ThinLTO, but needs some more work to make sure it scales well across multiple threads. Please let me know

Hi All, While I'm certainly comfortable compiling from sources, I'm trying to do an rpm only asterisk install on CentOS 5.7. I'm using the asterisk repositories and I installed all the asterisk18 rpms, but find that chan_gtalk and res_jabber are missing. Is there a separate rpm that includes support for gtalk? Thanks in advance. -Gaurav -------------- next part -------------- An

Hello, I need to regress data like the example below. The data points represent friction factors derived from observed trip length data. The function used to describe this data is a gamma function of the form, f(t) = a * t^b * e^(c*t) and I need to regress the data to obtain the a,b, and c coefficients. The gamma function can also be expressed in the log-linear form, ln[f(t)] = ln[a] + b

On 04/09/2020 19:02, Gregory Sloop wrote: > Re: [Samba] SID mapping: Samba and SSSD > > > *Rpvs> On 03/09/2020 22:35, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba > wrote: > >>> On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>>> Happy to review if you write it :-). Anything that >

After messing around with this a bit recently, I've come to the following conclusions: 1. One issue is at what granularity to consider the PGO weightings. For example, should a set of 50 consecutive cases with 65% of the total weight distributed approximately evenly and which can be lowered to a table lookup be handled before the 3 remaining cases that 5%, 10%, and 20% probability,

On 19/01/2015 4:13 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi at kernel.org> wrote: >> I just thought that such a small patch which causes no visible change to >> SVN users and allow for git users to build R would be acceptable, but if >> it isn't, that's fine too. > > Felipe --- > > It would appear that you are

Hi, I’d like to propose adding a new example directory (llvm/examples/IRTransforms) as a new home for example code used by various tutorials. After talking to a few people at the Developers meeting, it became clear to me that it would be valuable to have the code examples for various tutorials in-tree to keep them from bit-rotting and make it very easy to build them. I’d suggest adding new IR

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:08 PM Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: > > > > On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via

Brokers Move On ERMX! EntreMetrix Inc. (ERMX) $0.18 Heavy trading today as ERMX announced its launch of digital support tools for its portfolio companies. Brokers are getting ahead of this steady climb as they grab up large blocks of shares for there clients. Look at the numbers and get on ERMX Friday morning! KNEEguru: Are there any contraindications for the procedure? if the laws of physics

Brokers Move On ERMX! EntreMetrix Inc. (ERMX) $0.18 Heavy trading today as ERMX announced its launch of digital support tools for its portfolio companies. Brokers are getting ahead of this steady climb as they grab up large blocks of shares for there clients. Look at the numbers and get on ERMX Friday morning! KNEEguru: Are there any contraindications for the procedure? if the laws of physics

> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> > wrote: >> All, >> About two months ago I posted a patch that hoisted the hottest case >> statement from a switch statement during ISelLowering. >> >> See: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5786 >> >> Sean was rather adamant about using a Huffman tree (and I agree this is