Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "freml".
Did you mean:
reml
2012 Jun 02
2
mgcv (bam) very large standard error difference between versions 1.7-11 and 1.7-17, bug?
...ults in a larger set of significant predictors. Is this result
expected given the improvements in the new version? Or this a bug and
are the p-values of bam in mgcv 1.7-17 too low? The summaries of both
versions are shown below to enable a comparison.
In addition, applying the default method="fREML" (mgcv version 1.7-17)
on the same dataset yields only non-significant results, while all
results are highly significant using method="REML". Furthermore, it
also results in large negative (e.g., -8757) edf values linked to
s(X,bs="RE") terms. Is this correct, or is this a...