search for: frej

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "frej".

Did you mean: free
2003 Aug 19
1
[OT] Virus propagation by asterisk user member.
Sorry to air this in public, but sometimes people need to be publicly shamed. "Frej Jensen" <frej@legespace.dk> This user is spewing the sobig worm around the net. I have received over 20 messages so far today. Most to me at both my former address, and my current address. I matched the IP address from my mail servers logs to his cable modem address used when posting a...
2015 Feb 19
3
[LLVMdev] Patchpoints used for inline caches and pointless reloads
...only used by instructions which are anyregcc patchpoints. During the last two weeks I have made a couple unsuccessful attempts at that and could really use some pointers from someone who understands it. Attached is a the smallest example I have managed to find which shows the problem. Regards, --Frej -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bug.ll Type: application/octet-stream Size: 808 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150219/bce5d0c5/attachment.obj>
2019 Jan 15
7
[RFC] Introducing an explicit calling convention
...instead have a function attribute which points to a metadata tuple with the explicit registers. References ========== [1] https://llvm.org/docs/StackMaps.html#stack-map-format [2] https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2633450 [3] https://llvm.org/docs/StackMaps.html#stack-map-section Regards, --Frej Drejhammar
2012 Mar 24
13
[Bug 47790] New: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.3.0 - black screen on second nouveau display
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47790 Bug #: 47790 Summary: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.3.0 - black screen on second nouveau display Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal
2019 Jan 15
4
[RFC] Introducing an explicit calling convention
David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I'm not opposed to this in principle, and actually I'd quite like to > move in this direction and remove our reliance on undocumented and > inconsistent conventions between the back end and the front end for > conveying information about ABIs. For example, returning two 32-bit > integers or a pair of
2019 Jan 15
3
[RFC] Introducing an explicit calling convention
[+CC Kai Nacke, who I remember talking about this topic at a FOSDEM 2014 talk] On 2019-01-15 19:14, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:24 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> >> > I'm not opposed to this in principle,