search for: freereb

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4...

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any > way we could possibly resolve it today? > > > > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894 > > > > *From: *Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at...

...//review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards, Amar On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any > way we could possibly resolve it today? > > > > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894 > > > > *From: *Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at...

...or shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4...

...t could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.1...

On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya &gt...

...nodes 6%* Check the .vol files to see if the value has changed. It should now be 1.You do not need to restart the volume. See [1] for more details. Regards, Nithya [1] http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/GlusterFS%20Filter/ On 31 January 2018 at 23:39, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Amar, > > > > Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and > re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the > shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, > we will wait until a fix...

...Fundamental block size: 4096 Blocks: Total: 15626471424 Free: 15626461604 Available: 15626461604 Inodes: Total: 1250159424 Free: 1250153857 Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 10:46 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov> Cc: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 Thank you Eva. From the files you sent: dataeng.jacen.bricks-data_A1-dataeng.vo...

On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > &...

...s/data_B3 /dev/sdd1 59T 39M 59T 1% /bricks/data_B4 /dev/sda1 59T 38T 22T 64% /bricks/data_B1 server-B:/dataeng 350T 83T 268T 24% /dataeng Eva Freer From: Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:43 PM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 We noticed something similar. Out of interest,...

After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both servers and clients. We have 2 different server configurations. Configuration 1: A distributed volume of 8 bricks with 4 on each server. The initial configuration had 4 bricks of

...hing similar. Out of interest, does du -sh . show the same size? -- Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or partners. > On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:47 pm, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > > After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both servers and clients. > > We have 2 di...

Hi Eva, Can you send us the following: gluster volume info gluster volume status The log files and tcpdump for df on a fresh mount point for that volume. Thanks, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 07:17, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, > the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point > for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both > servers and clients. > > >...

...m> wrote: > Hi Eva, > > Can you send us the following: > > gluster volume info > gluster volume status > > The log files and tcpdump for df on a fresh mount point for that volume. > > Thanks, > Nithya > > > On 31 January 2018 at 07:17, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > >> After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, >> the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point >> for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both >> servers and clie...