Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "freed_tabl".
Did you mean:
freed_tables
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> * doing a speculative memory access.
> */
> if (info->freed_tables) {
> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> - (void *)info, 1);
> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> + flush_tlb_func_local,
> + (void *)info, 1);
> } else {
> /*
> * Although we could have used on...
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> * doing a speculative memory access.
> */
> if (info->freed_tables) {
> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> - (void *)info, 1);
> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> + flush_tlb_func_local,
> + (void *)info, 1);
> } else {
> /*
> * Although we could have used on...
2019 Jul 22
0
[PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>> * doing a speculative memory access.
>> */
>> if (info->freed_tables) {
>> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> - (void *)info, 1);
>> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> + flush_tlb_func_local,
>> + (void *)info, 1);
>> } else {
>> /*
>> * A...
2019 Jul 19
5
[PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes
[ Cover-letter is identical to v2, including benchmark results,
excluding the change log. ]
Currently, local and remote TLB flushes are not performed concurrently,
which introduces unnecessary overhead - each INVLPG can take 100s of
cycles. This patch-set allows TLB flushes to be run concurrently: first
request the remote CPUs to initiate the flush, then run it locally, and
finally wait for
2019 Jul 02
0
[PATCH v2 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...e cpus
*
* ..but the i386 has somewhat limited tlb flushing capabilities,
* and page-granular flushes are available only on i486 and up.
@@ -563,13 +563,14 @@ extern void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, unsigned int stride_shift,
bool freed_tables);
extern void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
+extern void flush_tlb_func_local(const struct flush_tlb_info *info);
static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long a)
{
flush_tlb_mm_range(vma->vm_mm, a, a + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIF...
2019 Jul 19
0
[PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...sh_tlb_func_local((void *)info);
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables) {
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local,
+ (void *)info, 1);
} else {
/*
* Although we could have used on_each_cpu_cond_mask(),
@@ -737,7 +745,8...
2019 Jul 02
2
[PATCH v2 0/9] x86: Concurrent TLB flushes
Currently, local and remote TLB flushes are not performed concurrently,
which introduces unnecessary overhead - each INVLPG can take 100s of
cycles. This patch-set allows TLB flushes to be run concurrently: first
request the remote CPUs to initiate the flush, then run it locally, and
finally wait for the remote CPUs to finish their work.
In addition, there are various small optimizations to avoid
2019 Jun 13
4
[PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -704,11 +718,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...
2019 Jun 13
4
[PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -704,11 +718,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...
2019 Jun 25
0
[PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...t; cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
> if (cpumask)
> smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> @@ -704,11 +718,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> * doing a speculative memory access.
> */
> if (info->freed_tables)
> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> - (void *)info, 1);
> - else
> - on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
> - (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>...
2019 Jun 26
2
[PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
>> if (cpumask)
>> smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> @@ -704,11 +718,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>> * doing a speculative memory access.
>> */
>> if (info->freed_tables)
>> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> - (void *)info, 1);
>> - else
>> - on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> - (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
>> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, fl...
2019 Jun 26
2
[PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
>> if (cpumask)
>> smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> @@ -704,11 +718,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>> * doing a speculative memory access.
>> */
>> if (info->freed_tables)
>> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> - (void *)info, 1);
>> - else
>> - on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
>> - (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
>> + __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, fl...
2019 May 31
2
[RFC PATCH v2 04/12] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -703,11 +726,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...
2019 May 31
2
[RFC PATCH v2 04/12] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -703,11 +726,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...
2019 May 25
3
[RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -703,11 +726,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...
2019 May 25
3
[RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
...)info);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
cpumask = uv_flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
if (cpumask)
smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
@@ -703,11 +726,39 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
* doing a speculative memory access.
*/
if (info->freed_tables)
- smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1);
- else
- on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
- (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
+ __smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+ flush_tlb_func_local, (voi...