search for: freecode

...earned that libogg 1.3.0 had been released in August 2011. Curiously, there seems to have been no announcement mail here, and it is not being mentioned on <http://www.xiph.org/press/> either. Is that on purpose? Is there some other channel I could subscribe to in order to learn about updates? Freecode.com doesn't have up-to-date info either (though I just submitted a 1.3.0 update; last they list for libogg is 1.1.3). My motivation is that I package libogg for Fink <http://www.finkproject.org/> and as such would like to know when a new version of libogg (and libvorbis, libao etc.) is r...

On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >> use ISL's ILP to solve it. > > isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus > would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. This is fine for something that wants to live out...

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:47 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL > >>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and > >>> use ISL's ILP to solve it. > >> > >> isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus > >> would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. > > >...

...17 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:47 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>>>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >>>>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >>>>> use ISL's ILP to solve it. >>>> >>>> isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus >>>> would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. &gt...

On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >>> use ISL's ILP to solve it. >> >> isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus >> would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. > > This is fine for somethin...

...if a dependence exists between them, and > > Would you consider using Polly http://polly.grosser.es to avoid > writing this code? I agree, we should use the (self-contained) passes developed in Polly where possible. > If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL > http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and > use ISL's ILP to solve it. isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. > > These would be my preferred choices to implement the depe...

...roblem in two parts: >>      1. a dependence test that, given two memory references, decides >>         if a dependence exists between them, and Would you consider using Polly http://polly.grosser.es to avoid writing this code? If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and use ISL's ILP to solve it. These would be my preferred choices to implement the dependence test: on the GCC side I have implemented a stand alone dependence tester that does not use ILP (i.e., sets the dependence test as a Diophantine equat...

...mpatient giving up saying the curciet beeing busy. So, what I'm looking for, is were to set the timeout when placing calls on the TE110P (not Dial timeout parameter) so that calls to forwarded numbers, abroad and cell numbers work ok. In need of a response soon. -- Claes Nasten, <claes{@}freecode{.}no>

we just purchase new I/O card and like to check I/O performance. for sequence I/O performance test we can use "hdparm -t /dev/xxx" bur for random I/O performance test which Linux command I can use? ** our environment does NOT allow install third party software.. Thanks

On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 20:59 -0800, Preston Briggs wrote: > Hal wrote: > > 3. Loop vectorization - It would be nice to have, in addition to > > basic-block vectorization, a more-traditional loop vectorization > pass. I > > think that we'll need a better loop analysis pass in order for this > to > > happen. Some of this was started in LoopDependenceAnalysis, but

Hal wrote: > 3. Loop vectorization - It would be nice to have, in addition to > basic-block vectorization, a more-traditional loop vectorization pass. I > think that we'll need a better loop analysis pass in order for this to > happen. Some of this was started in LoopDependenceAnalysis, but that > pass is not yet finished. We'll need something like this to recognize >

Hi guys I have met some troubles when I want to evaluate the glusterfs performance with small file workload. 1: What kind of benchmark should I use to test the small file operation ? As we all know, we can use iozone tools to test the large file operation, while for the sake of memory cache, if we testing small file operation with iozone, the result will not correct.

I have a 1.5 TB (1,475,720,773,632) partition that I wanted to convert from ext4 to btrfs. It is currently used as / for ubuntu 10.10. I booted into 11.04 beta2 and tried a ''btrfs-convert /dev/sdc1'', but after about 20 minutes it segfaulted. I performed a: sck.ext4 -cDfty -C 0 /dev/sdc1 After everything was clean, I downloaded the debugging symbols for btrfs-convert and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi I have searched a bit for information regarding the status on the dialplan in lua (pbx_lua.so). I know that 'hint' won't work and has to be put in the regular extensions.conf/ael. Are there any other considerations? Features that are not implemented, or known stability issues? Thanks, Tommy Botten Jensen -----BEGIN PGP