search for: free_init_pages

I'm triggering this BUG_ON during boot, which happens while freeing initrd memory: EIP is at free_init_pages+0x37/0xac [<c01143f1>] free_initrd_mem+0x11/0x13 [<c03ce259>] free_initrd+0x13/0x29 [<c03cf647>] populate_rootfs+0xdc/0xe2 [<c01003af>] init+0x42/0x253 [<c0103bbb>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 I'm not sure why this memory isn't aligned now. The patch...

I'm triggering this BUG_ON during boot, which happens while freeing initrd memory: EIP is at free_init_pages+0x37/0xac [<c01143f1>] free_initrd_mem+0x11/0x13 [<c03ce259>] free_initrd+0x13/0x29 [<c03cf647>] populate_rootfs+0xdc/0xe2 [<c01003af>] init+0x42/0x253 [<c0103bbb>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 I'm not sure why this memory isn't aligned now. The patch...

...++--- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c index 232d6e1bcfc6..5cec395a4b0d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c @@ -407,6 +407,31 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void) free_init_pages("unused decrypted", vaddr, vaddr_end); } +static void print_mem_encrypt_feature_info(void) +{ + pr_info("AMD Memory Encryption Features active:"); + + /* Secure Memory Encryption */ + if (sme_active()) { + /* + * SME is mutually exclusive with any of the SEV + * features...

...+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 888184b..c2f7f47 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -998,7 +998,11 @@ extern unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp); extern void free_init_pages(char *what, unsigned long begin, unsigned long end); void default_idle(void); -bool set_pm_idle_to_default(void); +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN +bool xen_set_default_idle(void); +#else +#define xen_set_default_idle 0 +#endif void stop_this_cpu(void *dummy); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arc...

Hi Andi, Here's a little batch of cleanups: - re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled - make the parainstructions symbols match the other altinstructions naming convention - add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for smp and pv_ops Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no particularly good reason. J --

Hi Andi, Here's a little batch of cleanups: - re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled - make the parainstructions symbols match the other altinstructions naming convention - add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for smp and pv_ops Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no particularly good reason. J --

...06 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c Wed Oct 18 06:07:03 2006 -0700 @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp) void __init alternative_instructions(void) { + unsigned long flags; if (no_replacement) { printk(KERN_INFO "(SMP-)alternatives turned off\n"); free_init_pages("SMP alternatives", @@ -351,6 +352,8 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(voi (unsigned long)__smp_alt_end); return; } + + local_irq_save(flags); apply_alternatives(__alt_instructions, __alt_instructions_end); /* switch to patch-once-at-boottime-only mode and free the @...

...06 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/alternative.c Wed Oct 18 06:07:03 2006 -0700 @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp) void __init alternative_instructions(void) { + unsigned long flags; if (no_replacement) { printk(KERN_INFO "(SMP-)alternatives turned off\n"); free_init_pages("SMP alternatives", @@ -351,6 +352,8 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(voi (unsigned long)__smp_alt_end); return; } + + local_irq_save(flags); apply_alternatives(__alt_instructions, __alt_instructions_end); /* switch to patch-once-at-boottime-only mode and free the @...

...;] apply_paravirt+0xb3/0xe0 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffad8973f4>] ? vprintk_emit+0x3c4/0x510 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffad9a00e6>] ? free_hot_cold_page+0x106/0x160 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffad99bc6d>] ? adjust_managed_page_count+0x5d/0x80 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffad86fc6a>] ? free_init_pages+0x15a/0x1b0 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffae579537>] alternative_instructions+0xc3/0xca [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffae57b0cb>] check_bugs+0x25f/0x2b6 [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffae56c19d>] start_kernel+0x422/0x46c [ 110.721000] [<ffffffffae56bb7b>] ? repair_env_string+0x5c/0x5c [...

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by