search for: free_func

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "free_func".

Did you mean: free_fn
2002 Nov 24
4
[LLVMdev] globals in DS graph
I have some questions regarding how globals are represented in DS graph. Specifically, I wrote the following simple program: List *g; void alloc_func(){ g = ( List* ) malloc( sizeof( List ) ); } void free_func(){ free( g ); } int main(){ alloc_func(); free_func(); } I noticed that the DSnode for g in alloc_func is different from that of free_func and NEITHER of them had GlobalNode bit set in their types. Only the malloc bit and the incomplete bit have been set. I am completely clueless how to fig...
2002 Nov 25
3
[LLVMdev] globals in DS graph
...s in DS graph > Sender: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:34:14 -0600 (CST) > > > Specifically, I wrote the following simple program: > > List *g; > > void alloc_func(){ > > g = ( List* ) malloc( sizeof( List ) ); > > } > > void free_func(){ > > free( g ); > > } > > I don't have an LLVM tree available to me right now (as > tank/llvm.cs.uiuc.edu) is down, so take this with a grain of salt... > > > I noticed that the DSnode for g in alloc_func is different from that of > > free_func and NEIT...
2002 Nov 22
3
[LLVMdev] Re: calls to exit()
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, lee white baugh wrote: > do calls to exit() always have a null target-function pointer? that is > what i think i am seeing. Currently, yes. What's actually happening is that the call gets moved to the "globals graph". Essentially, this is due to the fact that the function call cannot modify the local memory graph of the current function. In cases where
2002 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] globals in DS graph
> Specifically, I wrote the following simple program: > List *g; > void alloc_func(){ > g = ( List* ) malloc( sizeof( List ) ); > } > void free_func(){ > free( g ); > } I don't have an LLVM tree available to me right now (as tank/llvm.cs.uiuc.edu) is down, so take this with a grain of salt... > I noticed that the DSnode for g in alloc_func is different from that of > free_func and NEITHER of them had GlobalNode bit set in th...
2002 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] globals in DS graph
...n at cs.uiuc.edu > > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:34:14 -0600 (CST) > > > > > Specifically, I wrote the following simple program: > > > List *g; > > > void alloc_func(){ > > > g = ( List* ) malloc( sizeof( List ) ); > > > } > > > void free_func(){ > > > free( g ); > > > } > > > > I don't have an LLVM tree available to me right now (as > > tank/llvm.cs.uiuc.edu) is down, so take this with a grain of salt... > > > > > I noticed that the DSnode for g in alloc_func is different from tha...
2015 Feb 23
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 6.8
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Kevin Brott wrote: > Hrm - I'll have to run this on one of my linux boxxen and then schlep the > source over - the AIX/HP-UX boxenn have an older version of the autoconf > tools and autoreconf is broken/missing ... and that seems to work. > > Now the build fails here on AIX 6.1/7.1 ... > > xlc_r -O2 -qarch=ppc -qalloca -I/usr/include
2015 Feb 24
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 6.8
...ELPER=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh-pkcs11-helper\" > -D_PATH_SSH_PIDDIR=\"/var/run\" -D_PATH_PRIVSEP_CHROOT_DIR=\"/var/empty\" > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c packet.c -o packet.o > "/usr/include/openssl/objects.h", line 1009.31: 1506-275 (S) Unexpected > text free_func encountered. > make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. I also ran into this on old GCCs. It seems to be related to include orders although I don't understand why. On a hunch I tried this which seems to fix it for me, but again I don't understand why... Does it also...
2018 Aug 24
0
Announce: OpenSSH 7.8 released
...onfiguration dump output (ssh -G). bz#2835 Portability ----------- * sshd(8): Expose details of completed authentication to PAM auth modules via SSH_AUTH_INFO_0 in the PAM environment. bz#2408 * Fix compilation problems caused by fights between zlib and OpenSSL colliding uses of "free_func" * Improve detection of unsupported compiler options. Recently these may have manifested as "unsupported -Wl,-z,retpoline" warnings during linking. * sshd(8): some sandbox support for Linux/s390 bz#2752. * regress tests: unbreak key-options.sh test on platforms without...
2018 Aug 24
0
Announce: OpenSSH 7.8 released
...onfiguration dump output (ssh -G). bz#2835 Portability ----------- * sshd(8): Expose details of completed authentication to PAM auth modules via SSH_AUTH_INFO_0 in the PAM environment. bz#2408 * Fix compilation problems caused by fights between zlib and OpenSSL colliding uses of "free_func" * Improve detection of unsupported compiler options. Recently these may have manifested as "unsupported -Wl,-z,retpoline" warnings during linking. * sshd(8): some sandbox support for Linux/s390 bz#2752. * regress tests: unbreak key-options.sh test on platforms without...
2015 Feb 23
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 6.8
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Kevin Brott <kevin.brott at gmail.com> wrote: > Just as an FYI - the whole sys/queue.h issue is impacting HP-UX 11.23 and > 11.31 as well - so we'll see how the latest fixes flush out. > > And, not to play the fool overmuch - but is there a quick howto on how > you're expecting we get the git clone pulls into a buildable state? When I
2018 Aug 10
10
Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.8
...onfiguration dump output (ssh -G). bz#2835 Portability ----------- * sshd(8): Expose details of completed authentication to PAM auth modules via SSH_AUTH_INFO_0 in the PAM environment. bz#2408 * Fix compilation problems caused by fights between zlib and OpenSSL colliding uses of "free_func" * Improve detection of unsupported compiler options. Recently these may have manifested as "unsupported -Wl,-z,retpoline" warnings during linking. * sshd(8): some sandbox support for Linux/s390 bz#2752. * regress tests: unbreak key-options.sh test on platforms without...
2012 Aug 20
13
[PATCH 00/12] Multidisk support
Hello, the following patches should get multidisk access working. The syntax accepted is the following: (hdx,y)/path/to/file where x is the disk number and start at 0 and the y is the partition number starting at 1. So (hd0,1) is the first partition of the first disk. the other accepted syntax is using MBR's 32 bits disk signature so for example: (mbr:0x12345678,2)/foo/bar would address