Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "fraz".
Did you mean:
frag
2006 Mar 15
9
Mongrel Web Server 0.3.11 -- Edge Rails and Win32Compliant
...#39;'t think there''s a way to do that other than using a proxy
(ISAPI_REWRITE) or just a server-side redirect. I''d love to be proven
wrong though.
-----Original Message-----
From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org
[mailto:rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of frazer horn
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:13 AM
To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: Re: [Rails] Mongrel Web Server 0.3.11 -- Edge Rails and
Win32Compliant
Hi Zed
I am about to try Mongrel on windows and hope to use it in production
for a project. Is it possible to use Mongrel with iis? If...
2006 Mar 27
24
Mongrel Web Server 0.3.12 -- Pre-Release
Hello Everyone,
Mongrel is due for a 0.3.12 release which will feature some pretty insane
goodies for everyone. There''s talk of IOWA support, lots of speed
improvements (including sendfile support), a great Configurator which makes
configuring Mongrel a snap (especially for framework implementers), and a
ton of debugging stuff.
WARNING
This is a pre-release announcement for the
2006 Dec 15
15
running mongrel in production on win32
Hey guys, I''m running the mongrel server that comes with rails-1.2rc1
for development on a winxp box, anticipating taking it into production
on a win2k3 box in the next few weeks. I''ve had a couple of crashes
occur during development that give me pause, however. I made a ticket
for the last one here:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6841
I know, or at least believe, that
2006 Mar 15
6
Mongrel Web Server 0.3.11 -- Edge Rails and Win32 Compliant
Hello Folks,
This is the big release of Mongrel that''s been in the works for a while now
(well, like a week). It is chock full of changes and features, but mostly
it syncs up the Win32 side of things, and validates that Edge Rails works
without problems. It also features a more extensive and useful example of
the GemPlugins called mongrel_config.
First the usual stuff for people
2006 Feb 24
8
RoR meets .net *cringe*
It was a miserable failure for us. Your best bet is to run on Linux.
> 1. Has anyone done any benchmarks with it? Is there any reason this
> couldn''t be viable for production loads? (feel free to speculate if
you
> haven''t)
When it finally worked, after two weeks of trial and error (and we can''t
reproduce it again) it performs poorly under IIS. It looks