search for: fraser

Folks, The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published. You can grab it from here: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged ''4.0.0-rc1'') Please test it! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi Gavin, Do you mean something along the lines of having my array struct as { i32, i32* } and then indexing it with a gep and allocating the appropriate memory when I learn of it? Thanks, Fraser Gavin Harrison-2 wrote: > > Hi Fraser, > > Is there anything preventing you from using a pointer for the second part > of the structure and allocating memory for it later? > > Thanks, > Gavin > > On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Fraser Cormack wrote: > >>...

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

...source.com You can reach the person managing the list at xen-users-owner@lists.xensource.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Xen-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: switchroot mount failed (Keir Fraser) 2. Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: switchroot mount failed (vineet chadha) 3. Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: switchroot mount failed (vineet chadha) 4. Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: switchroot mount failed (Keir Fraser) 5. Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: switchroot mount failed (vineet chadha) ------------------...

hi, It looks that Xen currently only support ISA serial port, which is onboard. Is there any plan to support the PCI serial port? Thanks, Neo -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven''t the technology we are using! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

...5 But I don't understand how I'd associate this allocation with the existing integer 'array' pointer. Also, what would happen when the function returns, wouldn't the new array allocation portion go out of scope, as it's allocated on the function's stack frame? Thanks, Fraser Gavin Harrison-2 wrote: > > Yes, that is what I mean. :-) > On Mar 12, 2012 11:02 AM, "Fraser Cormack" <frasercrmck at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Gavin, >> >> Do you mean something along the lines of having my array struct as { i32, >&gt...

Folks, The second release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as ''3.4.0-rc2''. Please test! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Yes, that is what I mean. :-) On Mar 12, 2012 11:02 AM, "Fraser Cormack" <frasercrmck at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Gavin, > > Do you mean something along the lines of having my array struct as { i32, > i32* } and then indexing it with a gep and allocating the appropriate > memory > when I learn of it? > > Thanks, > Frase...

...9c04a8384 baseline version: xen a65612bcbb92 ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> ------------------------------------------------------------ jobs: build-i386-xcpkern pass build-amd64 fail build-i386 fail...

Hi Duncan, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Fraser, it looks to me like you are smashing the stack. > >> define void @main() nounwind { >> allocas: >> %0 = alloca { i32, [0 x i32] }, align 8 > > ^ this allocates 4 bytes on the stack. > >> %2 = getelementptr inbounds { i32, [0 x i32] }* %0, i64 0, i32 1 &...

...n.   Boris --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 9:46 AM Current environment:- root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm info host                   : Server1 release                : 2.6.27.5 version                : #2 SMP Sat Feb 14 13:48:51 EST 2009 machine                : x86_64 n...

Hi, In changeset 19130:c8962b24fb50, when using iommu=1, it goes into the hypervisor debugger. Why is this so? Thanks. -Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

hi, I just tried the tip of the xen-unstable branch. It looks that the Xen supports 64bit BARs now? Thanks, Neo -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven''t the technology we are using! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi Fraser, Is there anything preventing you from using a pointer for the second part of the structure and allocating memory for it later? Thanks, Gavin On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Fraser Cormack wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > > Duncan Sands wrote: >> >> Hi Fraser, it looks to...

...ock_time on hvm_latch_shinfo_size even if the bitness of the guest has already been set, this fixes the problem with the wallclock not being set for PVHVM guests on resume from migration. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> --- Since this is a bug fix, I think it is suitable for inclusion in the 4.3 release, and backported to older releases. --- xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 20 ++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(...

...thoughts on setting breakpoints around hypercalls? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Date: Dec 26, 2005 12:14 AM Subject: setting breakpoints around hypercalls in a domU causes dom0 to lockup To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser < Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> Stepping through hypercalls (at the source level, not using the trace trap) causes my dom0 to lockup. Might xen be receiving the int3 and not realize whom to forward to? -Kip _______________________________________________ X...

ioemu-remote: The device model needs to write in the ACPI tables when it wakes up from S3 state. Signed-off-by: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@eu.citrix.com> -- Jean Guyader _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ever since xen-unstable cset 14308 ("pci back: Fix registration of of filters on subsections of config space") I''ve been getting an MCA on the *2nd* boot of a driver domain using an e1000 NIC. Cset 14308 allowed the proper setup of the PM control registers, so the NIC is put in the D3 power state when the driver domain shuts down. Unfortunately, pci_set_power_state()

Hi, I''ve a quad-core x86_64 machine (Intel Xeon), with sse/mmx support. However, I want to disable sse/mmx support from HVM guests. How can I do this? Also, is it reasonable to expect illegal instruction fault in non-root VMX mode if a guest VM runs an application with sse/mmx instructions? Thanks, Ashish _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list