search for: frankenstrass

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "frankenstrass".

Did you mean: frankenstrasse
2024 Aug 12
1
[PATCH v2 1/9] drm: Do delayed switcheroo in drm_lastclose()
...ntime or if there are other clients blocking the >>> -- >>> 2.46.0 >>> >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >> http://blog.ffwll.ch -- -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
2024 Aug 12
1
[PATCH v2 1/9] drm: Do delayed switcheroo in drm_lastclose()
...; > > 2.46.0 > > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Vetter > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch > > -- > -- > Thomas Zimmermann > Graphics Driver Developer > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany > GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman > HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg) > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
2024 Aug 12
1
[PATCH v2 5/9] drm/nouveau: Implement switcheroo reprobe with drm_client_dev_hotplug()
On 8/12/24 10:28 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Replace the call to drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed() with a call > to drm_client_dev_hotplug(). It is equivalent in functionality, but > uses the DRM client infrastructure. > > v2: > - fix commit description > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
2024 Aug 12
1
[PATCH v2 5/9] drm/nouveau: Implement switcheroo reprobe with drm_client_dev_hotplug()
...rvdata(pdev); >> +??? struct drm_device *dev = drm->dev; >> ? -??? drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed(drm->dev); >> +??? drm_client_dev_hotplug(dev); >> ? } >> ? ? static bool -- -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
2024 Sep 09
1
[PATCH v4 71/80] drm/vmwgfx: Run DRM default client setup
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 7:37?AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote: > > Call drm_client_setup() to run the kernel's default client setup > for DRM. Set fbdev_probe in struct drm_driver, so that the client > setup can start the common fbdev client. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> > Cc: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin at
2024 Aug 23
1
[PATCH v2 11/86] drm/atmel-hdlcd: Run DRM default client setup
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 02:59:08PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Call drm_client_setup_with_fourcc() to run the kernel's default client > setup for DRM. Set fbdev_probe in struct drm_driver, so that the client > setup can start the common fbdev client. > > v2: > - use drm_client_setup_with_fourcc() > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at
2024 Sep 12
1
[PATCH v4 68/80] drm/nouveau: Run DRM default client setup
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> I assume you can push this to drm-misc-next yourself? On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Call drm_client_setup() to run the kernel's default client setup > for DRM. Set fbdev_probe in struct drm_driver, so that the client > setup can start the common fbdev client. > > The nouveau driver specifies a
2010 Dec 16
19
Hypervisor hangs on startup
Hi! We have a problem that the dom0 very often does not boot and hangs in the hypervisor - see screenshot. The last message is: (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 16 VCPUs (afterwards xen should overwrite the memory) We are using the xen kernel from kernel.org git. Kernel is 2.6.32.24-xen with Xen 4.0.1 Hardware is HP DL380. Is this a known problem? Any hints what could be the problem and how we can
2010 Dec 16
19
Hypervisor hangs on startup
Hi! We have a problem that the dom0 very often does not boot and hangs in the hypervisor - see screenshot. The last message is: (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 16 VCPUs (afterwards xen should overwrite the memory) We are using the xen kernel from kernel.org git. Kernel is 2.6.32.24-xen with Xen 4.0.1 Hardware is HP DL380. Is this a known problem? Any hints what could be the problem and how we can
2023 Jul 12
2
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:52?AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > > because with
2023 Jul 12
2
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:52?AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > > because with
2024 Feb 13
9
[PATCH v2 0/8] fbdev: Clean up include dependencies in header
Remove unnecessary dependencies in the include statements of the header file <linux/fb.h>. Several files throughout the kernel include the fbdev header, so reducing dependencies positively affects other subsystems as well. Also fix up nouveau and fbtft, which need backlight.h in some their source files. v2: * include backlight.h in fbtft (kernel test robot) Thomas Zimmermann (8):
2024 Aug 12
1
[PATCH v2 1/9] drm: Do delayed switcheroo in drm_lastclose()
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:23:44AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:28:22AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Amdgpu and nouveau call vga_switcheroo_process_delayed_switch() from > > their lastclose callbacks. Call it from drm_lastclose(), so that the > > driver functions can finally be removed. Only PCI devices with enabled > > switcheroo do
2023 Jul 13
3
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
hello Sean, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > IM[biased]O. I agree that
2023 Jul 13
3
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
hello Sean, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I usually wouldn't expect > sympathy here, but the questionable benefit does not outweigh the cost > IM[biased]O. I agree that
2023 Jul 13
1
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I
2023 Jul 13
1
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I
2023 Jul 12
3
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello Jani, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:34:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > > because with that name I
2023 Jul 12
3
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello Jani, On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:34:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly > > irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" > > because with that name I
2023 Jul 13
2
[Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
On 13/07/2023 16:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.07.23 um 16:41 schrieb Sean Paul: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig >> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>> hello Sean, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>> I'd really prefer this patch