Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "frankbox".
Did you mean:
frankb
2017 Jun 09
2
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
On 06/09/2017 05:13 PM, M. Balridge wrote:
> I do know that this little box of horrors has 200-300MB mbox INBOXes on an
> ext3 filesystem formatted in 2005. I am very nervous about converting them to
> Maildir at this point. If I could get someone (or something) to the site and
> replace it with something much more suitable, I could have these people join
> the 21st Century.
I
2017 Jun 13
1
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
...k it's just doing a lot of work on the mbox file itself
>> (reading/writing/rewriting). Would be nice of course if it logged
>> more information, but mbox format is a bit too legacy to spend
>> much time on improving.
>
> I suspect the (heavy) use of procmail on Herr Frankbox is contributing to
> either some lock "confusion" *OR* triggering dovecot to do "expensive" mbox
> re-read/syncs or something?
Have you set mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes? That should be helpful.
2017 Jun 11
0
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
...you think?
> I think it's just doing a lot of work on the mbox file itself
>(reading/writing/rewriting). Would be nice of course if it logged
> more information, but mbox format is a bit too legacy to spend
> much time on improving.
I suspect the (heavy) use of procmail on Herr Frankbox is contributing to
either some lock "confusion" *OR* triggering dovecot to do "expensive" mbox
re-read/syncs or something?
There are mail-mulching scriplets in the global procmail (tied to spamassassin
results). Some daintily direct the dross to the /dev/null paradise in the sk...