search for: frame_pointers

Hi, right now, LLVM does register spilling by: 1. Creating stack object 2. Passing index of that stack object to MRegisterInfo::storeRegToStackSlot 3. At later stage, frame indices are replaced by calling to MRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex. This works for me, but there's slight problem. The target does not have "register + contant" addressing mode, so accessing frame index

On Tue, 23 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: > right now, LLVM does register spilling by: > > 1. Creating stack object > 2. Passing index of that stack object to MRegisterInfo::storeRegToStackSlot > 3. At later stage, frame indices are replaced by calling to > MRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex. > > This works for me, but there's slight problem. The target does not have

Hey, I was running some benchmarks (netserver/netperf) where the init script just launched the netserver and nothing else and was concerned to see the performance not up to par. This was an HVM guest running with PV drivers. If I compile the kernel without CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER it is much better - but it was my understanding that the tracing code does not impact the machine unless it is

Moving this month old RFC to llvmdev. Not sure why I sent this to cfe-dev in the first place... --- Based on code review discussion from John, he thinks filter expressions should be emitted into the body of the function with the try, rather than being outlined by the frontend. Instead of having the frontend create filter functions, we would use labels in place of typeinfo. The IR would look

Hi, kdb: to debug xen hypervisor, could also debug guests gdbsx: to debug PV/HVM linux guests The tree is : http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/debuggers.hg See README-dbg. You''ll need to setup serial access for kdb. Thanks, Mukesh > > Hi Dan, > > I''m currently using your version of ssplitd as it is. I haven''t tried > kdb. For some reason I

See http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/297170 for some information on how to get this going. I''ve rebased and addressed the review comments. As before several of the patches are not to be applied because they can be done better using infrastructure from Julien''s "Allow Xen to boot with a raw Device Tree" patch. They are included for completeness. With

Hi Reid, I’ve been following your proposal, and I’d be interested in helping out if I can. My main interest right now is in enabling C++ exception handling in clang for native (i.e. not mingw/cygwin) Windows targets (both 32-bit and 64-bit), but if I understand things correctly that will be closely related to your SEH work under the hood. I’m still trying to get up to speed on what is and is

See http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/297170 for some information on how to get this going. I''ve rebased and addressed the review comments. With this rebase I''ve picked up some patches from Julien which were required to do things properly, so the gic v7 and device blacklisting patches have been changed to use the proper mechanisms. Previously I was able to boot