Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fpowr".
Did you mean:
fpowi
2009 Apr 14
0
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
...1.0 spec requires. Is this something that I could
Merge back into the tree or is another approach required?
Some of the thoughts we were having as not to clutter the llvm namespace
was to add a math namespace and the intrinsic would go there instead.
i.e. llvm.math.fpow, llvm.math.fpowi, llvm.math.fpowr, etc...
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Micah
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Dan Gohman
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 6:30 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsi...
2009 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Micah,
>
>> There seems to be some math library functions that are already built
>> into llvm as intrinsic(pow, exp, etc...) but there are lots that
>> are not
>> built in yet. Is there currently work going on that is implementing
>> these? I do not want to duplicate work so I want to see what is out
2009 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
...something that I could
> Merge back into the tree or is another approach required?
> Some of the thoughts we were having as not to clutter the llvm
> namespace
> was to add a math namespace and the intrinsic would go there instead.
> i.e. llvm.math.fpow, llvm.math.fpowi, llvm.math.fpowr, etc...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Dan Gohman
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 6:30 PM
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> Subject:...