search for: fpowr

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fpowr".

Did you mean: fpowi
2009 Apr 14
0
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
...1.0 spec requires. Is this something that I could Merge back into the tree or is another approach required? Some of the thoughts we were having as not to clutter the llvm namespace was to add a math namespace and the intrinsic would go there instead. i.e. llvm.math.fpow, llvm.math.fpowi, llvm.math.fpowr, etc... Any ideas? Thanks, Micah -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Dan Gohman Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 6:30 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsi...
2009 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Micah, > >> There seems to be some math library functions that are already built >> into llvm as intrinsic(pow, exp, etc...) but there are lots that >> are not >> built in yet. Is there currently work going on that is implementing >> these? I do not want to duplicate work so I want to see what is out
2009 Apr 14
2
[LLVMdev] Math Library Intrinsics as native intrinsics
...something that I could > Merge back into the tree or is another approach required? > Some of the thoughts we were having as not to clutter the llvm > namespace > was to add a math namespace and the intrinsic would go there instead. > i.e. llvm.math.fpow, llvm.math.fpowi, llvm.math.fpowr, etc... > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Micah > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Dan Gohman > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 6:30 PM > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject:...