Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "fp_set_result".
2007 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...GetPossiblePreceedingTailCall(SDOperand Chain) {
This should be "static"?
+
+ Chain = DAG.getNode( X86ISD::CALL,
NodeTys, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
Stylistic nitpick: please merge 2 lines and remove the space after '('.
- Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
- Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
+ Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
+ Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
What happened here?
+// Check to see whether the next instruction following the call is a
return
+// A function is eligible if caller/callee calling co...
2007 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
The patch is against revision 42247.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tailcall-src.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 62639 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070923/4770302f/attachment.obj>
2007 Sep 24
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...> This should be "static"?
okay
> +
> + Chain = DAG.getNode( X86ISD::CALL,
> NodeTys, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
>
> Stylistic nitpick: please merge 2 lines and remove the space after
> '('.
okay
> - Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
> - Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
> + Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
> + Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
>
> What happened here?
Ups corrected.
>
> +// Check to see whether the next instruction following the call is a
> return
>...
2007 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
...>
> okay
>> +
>> + Chain = DAG.getNode( X86ISD::CALL,
>> NodeTys, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
>>
>> Stylistic nitpick: please merge 2 lines and remove the space after
>> '('.
> okay
>> - Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
>> - Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
>> + Chain = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::FP_SET_RESULT, Tys, Ops, 2);
>> + Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
>>
>> What happened here?
> Ups corrected.
>>
>> +// Check to see whether the next instruction followi...