Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "fotran".
Did you mean:
fortran
2010 Jul 26
2
easy debugging
I am new to R. Used to use FORTRAN. R is so different from FORTRAN. The
following codes would work in FOTRAN. I am trying to put an upper limit at
120. If the score is > 120, it is assigned 120. Or else, keep the original
values.
version 1:
equated<-11
result<-11
equated<-c(111.0,112.06, 112.9, 113.8, 115.0, 116.2, 117.0, 118.0, 120.5,
120.5, 120.5)
for (i in 1:11){
if (equated > 120) re...
2010 Aug 30
4
LOOping problem with R
...**
IN FORTRAN, the results is totally different.
program calculating_a
implicit none
integer i, j, k
double precision a, theta(4)
theta(1)=0.06; theta(2)=0.08; theta(3)=0.09; theta(4)=0
do i=1, 4
do j=1, 4
a=1
do k=i,j-1
a=a*theta(k)
end do
print*, a
end do
end do
end
Here goes the results with FOTRAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
0.06
4.79E-003
4.31E-004
1
1
0.08
7.2E-0.03
1
1
1
0.09
1
1
1
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you!
Nam
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Mar 27
0
Need some help at interfacing R with Fortran-90
...quot;.
It seems to be written for experienced programmers rathern than for people who occasionally face this problem.
A table summarising the main ley points for each supported platform would be very useful.
Something like:
Supported languages: C, Fortran-77, ......
Windows guidelines:
1. compie Fotran code with (commands) from (terminal / command line ... ?)
2. load compiled code with (commands) from (....)
3. call Fortran subroutine from R passing arguments ....
Linux guidelines:
1.
2.
3.
Unix guidelines:
1.
2.
3.
Coming to my problem. I have 4 Fortran-90 subroutines. There is a "main&q...
2005 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
...;
>> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway).
>> I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in
>> and out of my $PATH.
>
>
> I get the error with and without the --with-f2c option. I never used the
> NAG Fotran option. It works fine if I specifically use bash.
Can you do a "cvs status configure" on your llvm-test configure script
and make sure the sticky tag is release_16?
Also, does the configure process halt? Or does it just give an error
and keep going?
>
>> Can you verify tha...
2005 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
...though (see previous email).
>
> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've
> tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my
> $PATH.
I get the error with and without the --with-f2c option. I never used the
NAG Fotran option. It works fine if I specifically use bash.
> Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the --with-f2c
> option? If it does, I think we'll just file a bug report and fix it in 1.7.
It should have a bug filed. I can do that later or if you want to do it
now....
2001 Sep 11
3
64-bit programming
Has R been ported to 64-bit platforms? E.g. as in FORTRAN when you
define
double precision number as:
REAL*16
I have heard that some SUN computers already offer 64-bit architecture
but I am unsure
about the GNU support for that hardware. I am seeking increased
accuracy in floating
point operations.
regards
Helgi
--
Helgi Tomasson FAX: 354-552-6806
2005 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed
> though (see previous email).
I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway).
I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and
out of my $PATH.
Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the
--with-f2c option?