search for: foru

Hi, I am new to ROR. I have created a form with foru fields in ROR. Now its working fine for all CRUD operations. But I want to validate data on form for "validates_presence_of" validation. How to do this? I tried it by putting line "validates_presence_of :description" . But its not working. Its throws error like "undef...

...x = 0 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571) Closing connections [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837) bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service foru [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69) Yielding connection to foru [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stac...

...; Hello, >> >> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >> > > Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a sequence > of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are address-significant). > > I think it makes s...

...; >>> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >>> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >>> type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this >>> to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it >>> could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? >>> >> >> Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a >> sequence of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are >> address-significant)....

....org> wrote: > Hello, > > I think that the approach of using a section to record address > significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section > type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this > to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as it > could be potentially useful for other linkers, for example gold? > Yes, there is a new section type (SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG) and format (a sequence of ULEB128-encoded symbol table indexes that are address-significant). I think it makes sense for this to eventually be...