search for: fortified

...That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: I: dovecot-core: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/dovecot/auth N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N: functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called N: by any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated N: at compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian N: compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built usi...

...ted GCC options and running lintian. > > I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: > > I: dovecot-core: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/dovecot/auth > N: > N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc > N: functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called > N: by any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated > N: at compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian > N: compiler flags defined by dpkg-buil...

Dear List, I'm trying to use different R packages for my Teaching Assistantship classes. And I cam out to an (apparently) very simple problem. I would like to retrieve the vertices coordinate of a SpatialPolygon data. I know this is stored in the "coords" slot, but I can't get access to it! I tried to coerce the SpatialPolygon into a data.frame but it doesn't work.

...>>On 02/04/2011 07:04 p.m., Felipe Carrillo wrote: >>>>>>>If you want individual points overlayed on the shapefile, you need to add >>>>>>>another variable to it before you fortify it. >>>>>>>>After you fortify merge both the fortified dataset and the original shapefile. >>>>>>>>Go ahead and post your shapefile to see if >>>>>>>>I can figure it out. Do you just want the points or want text also? >>>>>>>>  >>>>>>>>Felipe D. Carrillo &g...

Hi folks (CCing llvm-dev, but that's probably more of a cfe-dev topic), As a follow-up to that old thread about -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/045845.html And, more recently, to this fedora thread where clang/llvm -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE support is claimed to be only partial: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2020 I dig into the glibc headers in

Hi, I couldn't find an equivalent GCC flag -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE in llvm. May I ask how can I disable the fortify source checking in LLVM please? More specifically, I want to bypass/ignore the errors like __fortify_fail Cheers, Ahmad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> [ Upstream commit a7ed3465daa240bdf01a5420f64336fee879c09d ] When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1 at huawei.com> When compiling with gcc 13 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, the following warning appears: In function ?fortify_memcpy_chk?, inlined from ?size_entry_mwt? at net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2118:2: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:25: error: call to ?__read_overflow2_field? declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level

Hi: I am practicing with the attached shapefile and was wondering if I can get some help. Haven't used 'rgdal' and 'maptools' much but it appears to be a great way bring map data into R. Please take a look at the comments and let me know if I need to explain better what I am trying to accomplish. library(rgdal) library(maptools) library(ggplot2) dsn="C:/Documents and

I am the maintainer of the 'tis' package. One of the functions in my package is 'nberShade'. A user wants to make nberShade generic, with the old version renamed as nberShade.default, all of which is fine with me. And he wants to add a new method, nberShade.ggplot, which works for objects of class ggplot. He also wants to add a method fortify.tis for the generic fortify defined

Hopefully the attachment will make it this time... Hi: I am practicing with the attached shapefile and was wondering if I can get some help. Haven't used 'rgdal' and 'maptools' much but it appears to be a great way bring map data into R. Please take a look at the comments and let me know if I need to explain better what I am trying to accomplish. library(rgdal)

I am having trouble getting data labels to display over the provinces in a GADM map of Canada. Specifically, I need the variable "Number" from the data set "by_province", grouped by "region", to appear on the corresponding regions of the map. The data set "by_province" looks like this: long lat order hole piece region

...ed. An instance >> of the class will be instantiated when running the `InstCombiner` pass. It's >> folding functionality will be invoked from `InstCombiner::tryOptimizeCall` and >> the implementation will be table-driven like `SimplifyLibCalls`. All of the >> existing fortified library call simplifiers will be migrated to this new class >> at this step. > > Ok, the idea is that other general parts of the compiler can use the LibCallSimplifier > interface as well? That makes sense to me. Yup, that's it. >> An option for enabling/disabling libra...