search for: forney

...i Damien, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > Thanks, but I don't think we're going to merge this one because I'm > somewhat worried that some systems we currently build on do not support > the -n syntax. Conversely, AFAIK everything* supports -number. Michael Forney said that he was trying to run on a system that did NOT support head -number and tail +number old-style format. This is why I suggested use of 'sed' instead of 'head' and 'tail'. The sed command predates both head and tail and the following idiom in sed should be common goi...

On 2019-11-27, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > applied, thanks. Surprised the fairly aggressive set of -W flags we use > by default didn't catch this... This can be caught with -Wpedantic, which seems to catch a few more instances of this, as well as passing non-void pointers to printf for the `%p` format specifier. Patches attached for these. However, it also catches

Full_Name: Elliott Forney Version: 2.9.2 OS: Linux, Fedora 10 Submission from: (NULL) (129.82.47.235) The following code creates a list of functions that are lexically closed over a single argument. If a print statement is included then each function in the list evaluates to a different value. If the print statement is...

This causes EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_iv to get replaced unnecessarily (or a duplicate symbol error if linking statically). --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 10696513..199975fe 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ if test "x$openssl" = "xyes" ; then

--- Makefile.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index 304d96cd..47e04c02 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ depend-rebuild: rm -f config.h touch config.h makedepend -w1000 -Y. -f .depend *.c 2>/dev/null - (head -2 .depend; tail +3 .depend | sort) >.depend.tmp + (head -n 2 .depend; tail -n +3

--- sshbuf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sshbuf.h b/sshbuf.h index 78e32264..4b71405a 100644 --- a/sshbuf.h +++ b/sshbuf.h @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int sshbuf_allocate(struct sshbuf *buf, size_t len); /* * Reserve len bytes in buf. * Returns 0 on success and a pointer to the first reserved byte via the - * optional dpp parameter or a negative * SSH_ERR_*

This is not valid in ISO C. --- ssh-sk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ssh-sk.c b/ssh-sk.c index 2b25c42f..3d6ac3d0 100644 --- a/ssh-sk.c +++ b/ssh-sk.c @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ sshsk_free_enroll_response(struct sk_enroll_response *r) freezero(r->signature, r->signature_len); freezero(r->attestation_cert, r->attestation_cert_len); freezero(r,

On 2019-11-14, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > Please give this a try - security key support is a substantial change and > it really needs testing ahead of the next release. Hi Damien, Thanks for working on security key support, this is a really nice feature to have in openssh. My non-FIDO2 security key (YubiKey NEO) doesn't work with the latest changes to openssh

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Darren Tucker wrote: > On 5 November 2018 at 16:41, Michael Forney <mforney at mforney.org> wrote: > > > This causes EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_iv to get replaced unnecessarily (or > > a duplicate symbol error if linking statically). > > > > Applied, thanks. should this go on the V_7_9 branch too? > > AC_SEARCH_LIBS([EVP_...

Hi! I've been playing with MKL for a few days and I noticed the instructions in the R Installation Administration manual [1] no longer apply. It seems that since version 10.0 (the one used by the manual), libmkl_lapack.so has been renamed/split (although the official explanations seem to imply this was already the case in 10.0 [2]). As a consequence, the instructions for dynamic linking no

Hello, I am working with two datasets with ~5,200 observations. Apparently, neither the correlog function (ncf package) nor the mantel function (ecodist package) can handle these datasets. Does anyone have any experience about the maximum number of observations these functions can handle? I am considering partitioning them into smaller subsets. This would not be an ideal