search for: former

Hey, I need help! (I'm kinda new to this.), This past weekend I switched over our server at work from a MS NT 4.0 server to a Red Hat Linux version 9 server. I had to set up several network shares via Samba. For testing purposes I set up a former employee's account on the new server. This account would enable me to communicate with the old server and the new to copy over files. All the other usernames changed from first name last initial to first initial last name, something our corporate office wanted. The former employees account w...

I have changed the branch names around to better match current reality. The branches are now: syslinux-4.xx -- 4.xx maintenance branch (former master) syslinux-5.xx -- 5.xx maintenance branch (former elflink) master -- development branch (6.xx, former firmware) Hopefully this will help avoid further confusion. -hpa

Hi all, Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of my tidy-up of the register allocator. - Lang.

I vote for execution of SimpleRewriter. Evan On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi all, > > Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as > SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's > badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of > my tidy-up of the register allocator. > > - Lang. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Dev...

I am new to R and use nnetTs - calls. If a time series of let's say 80000 Datapoints and did call nnetTs I want make a new net for the old ponts plus the next 1000 points (81000 datapoints total) what would again cost much calculation time. So I want to pre-init the new net with the former wonnen net to reduce the necessary iteration numbers. Is thee a possibility to do that and how? i.e.: x=ts(scan("C:/mydata1.csv")) mod.nnet<-nnetTs(x,m=2,size=8) x=ts(scan("C:/mydata2.csv")) mod.nnetnew<-nnetTs(x,m=2,size=8,control=list(init=mod.nnet)) ??? Thanks for a...

Hi. I am getting rid of my former nvidia graphic cards. Their models are not listed on http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/HardwareDonations/ but as advised, I post here. Hardware: - 7600GS 256MB (2 cards) Maker: Gigabyte, originally in SLI setup (wink, wink) Outputs: VGA, DVI-I, s-video, SLI - GTX280 1GB (1 card) Maker un...

...n Jun 3, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I vote for execution of SimpleRewriter. Yeah, go ahead and axe it: Off with its head! -Chris > > > Evan > > On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as >> SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's >> badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of >> my tidy-up of the register allocator. >> >> - Lang. >> _____________________________________...

...or execution of SimpleRewriter. > > Yeah, go ahead and axe it: Off with its head! > > -Chris > >> >> >> Evan >> >> On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as >>> SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's >>> badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of >>> my tidy-up of the register allocator. >>> >>> - Lang. >>> _____________...

...the global environnement) directly in my function by using ->>. Consequently, I just want to be sure that I will note have false results , and that i won't have problems I can't deal with (such as allocation memory). So , is it 1) or 2) ? Thank you Nicolas ---------------------- * Former question : I'd like to know if I can modify a constant value with a function. Example : a=4 f1<-function() {a=3} Of course, after the function f1() is executed , the value of a is always 4. I'd like the value returned is 3, like it is possible in C by doing *a=3 [[alternative HTML...

...I'm going to give my brain a rest for a bit before I resume tilting at the NTML windmill! I'll check back with the list to see if you've come up with anything. > Aki Again, thanks for all your help. --Mark -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: Configure Dovecot for GSSAPI [formerly: Looking for GSSAPI config] > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > From: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > Organization: Dovecot Oy > Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:54:27 +0300 > > On 04.07.2016 07:44, Mark Foley wrote: > > After a over a year and a half struggling to get Dov...

...bytes difference (until it gets allocated into the 8,022,089,728 bytes of the partition) - I'm thinking this is a standard formatting loss. My 4GB flash drive has 4,096,189,440 bytes on it, and twice that would be 8,192,378,880, which is a difference of 170,289,152 bytes, or about 162+MB. The former "CD" partition (which is invisible, so far) only had 8,645,202 bytes used on it, which leaves a huge amount of room to spare of inaccessible empty space. What am I missing? Or is that just the way it is? (The package only says "Some capacity is not available for data storage.&quot...

...2 28 157.2188 119780 2 20 1 162 863.8100" tor <- read.table(textConnection(xd1), header=TRUE, as.is=TRUE) # Grouping variable "xsmoke" must be a factor tor$xsmoke <- factor(tor$xsmoke,levels=c (1,2,3), labels=c('Current SMK','Former SMK', 'Never Smk'), ordered=TRUE) is.factor(tor$xsmoke) # object with survey design variables and data nhis <- svydesign (id=~psu,strat=~stratum, weights=~wt8, data=tor, nest=TRUE) MyBreaks <- c(18, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) #Chart 1 options( survey....

...es@lists.digium.com on behalf of Lacy Moore - Aspendora Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:55 PM To: Paul Mahler; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users]whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?" at&t (formerly SBC, formerly Southwestern Bell, formerly AT&T) just came out and installed my PRI. FYI, they used Cat 5e cable. No special T1 cabling that costs a fortune to buy somewhere, just plain old Cat 5e cable. Guess what guys? If they are using this as customers' sites, they are probably usi...

...o help me debug this. The server stops right after the line about detecting the AGP video. I have tried booting with noprobe and some other kernel options but nothing seems to work. Please let me know what else I can try to get it to boot. Thanks, Ajay # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom (formerly ServerWorks) CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 23) 00:00.1 PCI bridge: Broadcom (formerly ServerWorks) CNB20LE Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom (formerly ServerWorks) CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:00.3 Host bridge: Broadcom (formerly ServerWorks) CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:04....

...dc374a39f560833 > > --Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> > Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 03:23:30 -0400 > Organization: Ohio Highway Patrol Retirement System > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: Configure Dovecot for GSSAPI [formerly: Looking for GSSAPI config] > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:54:27 +0300 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Kerberos >> It has been now updated. > Excellent! That was quick! > > Although, you used my actual loca...

The new spilling framework inserts spill code in-place (during register allocation) rather than deferring it using VirtRegMap/VirtRegRewriter. The goal is to enable techniques like iterative splitting to be implemented. It should also be a bit tidier as it keeps more state in the MachineFunction, rather than in book-keeping structures like VirtRegMap. The work is in the very early stages though.

On Thursday 04 June 2009 19:03, Lang Hames wrote: > The new spilling framework inserts spill code in-place (during > register allocation) rather than deferring it using > VirtRegMap/VirtRegRewriter. The goal is to enable techniques like > iterative splitting to be implemented. It should also be a bit tidier > as it keeps more state in the MachineFunction, rather than in >

On 14/07/16 15:53, Mark Foley wrote: > Yes, they did add it to the dovecot wiki: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Kerberos > > Certainly, check with Marc. I wouldn't advocate doing things against policy (but changing the > policy a bit?) Even though this is about dovecot specifically, in general, one should be able > to authenticate locally, as you mention in your email

On 14/07/16 21:52, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 16:20 +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > >> I don't think the problem is with mentioning 'Dovecot', it is with >> using >> the DC for anything other than authentication. >> >> Reading the Dovecot wiki page, creating the user & SPN on the DC is >> okay, but once you start exporting

On 01/08/16 14:35, mathias dufresne wrote: > oki doki. Thank you for precision. > That kind of limitation should be added to the wiki as I would have already > tried to move Bind to a non-DC host if I was able to find to to do that. > And if I thought about that, some have thought about that before me. > If you look here: