search for: formatvers

* UDL Syntax is removed in the latest version of the patch <https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587>. * Name changed to `formatv` since `format_string` is too much to type. * Added conversion operators for `std::string` and `llvm::SmallString`. I had some feedback offline (not on this thread, unfortunately) that it might be worth using a printf style syntax instead of this Python-esque syntax.

To allow other pieces of code to process XML files easily, move the xml.ml* and xpath_helpers.ml* from v2v to mllib. --- docs/C_SOURCE_FILES | 2 +- mllib/Makefile.am | 9 ++++++-- {v2v => mllib}/xml-c.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- {v2v => mllib}/xml.ml | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ {v2v =>

James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> You might be able to hook up a template-specialization like mechanic to the >> processing of %s (similar to my current approach), but it's not obvious how >> you proceed from there to get custom format strings for individual types. >> For example, a formatter which can print a TimeSpan in

> On Nov 7, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > FWIW, if you're only ever formatting numbers and strings (which I agree is likely a majority of use cases), the syntax should be very easy to remember. Most of the time you don't need to specify anything other than the placeholder index. In that respect I expect it to catch

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:46 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Tentatively final version is up here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587 >> >> It has a verbal LGTM, but I plan to wait a bit

LLVM Weekly - #155, Dec 19th 2016 ================================= If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/155>. Welcome to the one hundred and fifty-fifth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:46 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Tentatively final version is up here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587 > > It has a verbal LGTM, but I plan to wait a bit longer just in case anyone > has some additional thoughts. It's a large patch, but if you're > interested, one way you can help

If you free an xmlDocPtr before any xmlXPathObjectPtrs that reference the doc, you'll get valgrind errors like this: ==7390== Invalid read of size 4 ==7390== at 0x4EB8BC6: xmlXPathFreeNodeSet (xpath.c:4185) ==7390== by 0x4EB8CC5: xmlXPathFreeObject (xpath.c:5492) ==7390== by 0x400A56: main (in /tmp/test) ==7390== Address 0x60c0928 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 120

If you free an xmlDocPtr before any xmlXPathObjectPtr 's that reference the doc, you'll get valgrind errors like this: ==7390== Invalid read of size 4 ==7390== at 0x4EB8BC6: xmlXPathFreeNodeSet (xpath.c:4185) ==7390== by 0x4EB8CC5: xmlXPathFreeObject (xpath.c:5492) ==7390== by 0x400A56: main (in /tmp/test) ==7390== Address 0x60c0928 is 8 bytes inside a block of size

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > TL;DR - I want this. For the most part, +1 from me too. A few comments though. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:11 AM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > ## Matchers > > To start off, it

Hi all, Here is a new version of the virt-builder-repository series taking care of Pino's comments. It has also been rebased on recent master. Cédric Bosdonnat (7): mllib: factorize code to add Checksum.get_checksum function Move xml and xpath_helpers OCAML code to mllib mllib: expose libosinfo DB reading functions in mllib builder: rename docs test script builder: add

In version 2: - No substantial change, I just tidied up the code a bit. - Removed one case where whitespace changes had crept in. Rich.

Hi guys, Here is a v3 of the series, including changes to answer Richard's comments. Cédric Bosdonnat (10): mllib: factorize code to add Checksum.get_checksum function Move xml and xpath_helpers OCAML code to mllib mllib: add Xml.parse_file helper lib/osinfo.c: Extract xml processing into a callback lib: extract osinfo DB traversing API mllib: ocaml wrapper for lib/osinfo

A long time ago I suggested that we might want to add gmock to compliment the facilities provided by gtest in LLVM's unittests. It didn't go over well: 1) There was concern over the benefit vs. the cost 2) Also concern about what the facilities would look like in practice and whether they would actually help 3) At the time, I didn't have good, large examples of what these things might