search for: forklift

...9;m trying to do a very simple slide_down effect with RJS templates. Basically a user selects a check box and a text box slides down. This works great in firefox, but causes IE to crash. The text box appears and slides down. Then the browser crashes. the in the partial is <div id=''forklift_div''> <label for=''incident_forklift''>Was There a forklift involved?</label> <%= check_box ''incident'', ''forklift''%> <% if @incident.forklift %> <div id=''fork_detail_div'' ><%= text_are...

.... >> I plan to add a new AD DC, version 4.11, by joining it to the domain. >> Can the domain function in production with three DCs on 4.7.9, and a >> new one running 4.11 ? >> Thanks,-Mike > >Yes, that should be fine. > >Andrew Bartlett > Can DCs be upgraded forklift-style, as in shutting down the VMs and bringing? up new VMs in their place, with the same name and address? Obviously counting on DC replication, which has worked without issues so far. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:? https://lists.samba.org/...

...e on. Instead I just get talked down to by some or others don't even read the situation I'm trying to solve. I don't need it to work like it used to in the NT4 sense. I don't need to use NT4 protocols. I'm just in need of not having Samba4 write in all of its documentation that forklift replacing your central authentication server is the only way to move forward. Wasn't the design goal to make it compatible in a Unix environment in the first place? How am I holding back Samba? I have a central LDAP server I have no control over but yet Samba4 requires me to replace it. I can...

I'm staring at an RFP--this company wants to replace a 2000 position PBX (at eight locations) with a new system. Their mindset is Nortel/Avaya because they talk about 28-button digital sets. The do specify a few IP phones for just one location, so they are aware of VoIP. I'm going to bid on this--there's nothing to lose except the time it takes to write the proposal. I'll

...39;t need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async > NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses standard components and that we can prevent forklift upgrades every 5,6,7 years by replacing a few bricks each year. Next to providing storage for home directories we would like to also use the hosts to run VM's in a hyperconverged setup (with their storage as an additional gluster volume on those bricks). Regards, Rik -- Rik Theys Syste...

...ecting the Nortel and * and the P$TN. Has anyone actually done this? Can it work? I really don't want to lie... If I need to present the plan as replacing the entire system all at once, that's fine, but they're a lot more likely to sign off if we can do it as a phase-out instead of a forklift upgrade. Thanks, David Gomillion

Il 26 ott 2016 8:30 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> ha scritto: > I would recommend using same major release with replication. > > If you are using maildir++ format, it should be enough to copy all the > maildir files over and start dovecot on new server. > This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with no need to upgrade the

...its lightweight design, versatile and built-in capabilities including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GSM/GPRS/EDGE, USB, IrDA and Serial interface etc, its ruggedized design is highly durable and rugged and can withstand drops from five feet to polished concrete or shock and vibration consistent with a truck or forklift mount. It is well suited for harsh environments with an IP65 rating making it dust and water resistant.N200Plus offers users the most versatile, flexible and convenient measurement capabilities. Main Features:Windows Mobile 6.1Lightweight and palm-sized design2.8?? Sun Readable Color LCD @ 752?480...

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:32:18PM -0700, Zetan Drableg wrote: > Ok - > By the way, I looked into updating out KVM versions. Since we already > have so many KVM servers of this version in production, I can't easily > forklift update everything without much testing. > > exec /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -s -S "$@" > > export LIBGUESTFS_HV=/root/work/qemu-wrapper > export LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct > > How do I simulate the setup of devices the test tool perform? > Just copy/pasting the qemu-k...

[Let's keep this on the mailing list] On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:48:25PM -0700, Zetan Drableg wrote: > Hi Richard, > I created qemu-wrapper: > #!/bin/bash -x > > exec gdbserver :1234 /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm "$@" gdbserver will end up debugging the qemu process, not the guest inside. This is not useful. You need to do something like: exec /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -s

...t; directory isn't synced. > and no one osd able to move from new to cur as users are blocked for login. If you are moving from 1.x to 2.x, I think you should make some trials first, and preferably move the user one at a time, blocking access to old server/new server during move. It is very forklift upgrade, much danger. Aki

Evolution prompted to accept the cert; which I did. Thunderbird used to prompt and allow acceptance; it no longer does... well sorta does. See my other posting for a screenshot where it shows "add server location https:// ...." HTTPS . no way to add from SMTP. Have also tried typing smtp://host:25 and https://host:25 On 4/30/20 5:39 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2020,

...d > down to by some or others don't even read the situation I'm trying to > solve. > > I don't need it to work like it used to in the NT4 sense. I don't > need to use NT4 protocols. I'm just in need of not having Samba4 > write in all of its documentation that forklift replacing your > central authentication server is the only way to move forward. Wasn't > the design goal to make it compatible in a Unix environment in the > first place? > > How am I holding back Samba? I have a central LDAP server I have no > control over That is the firs...

We're adding a new datacenter and am taking the opportunity to upgrade Samba version to 4.11. We have three AD servers currently on version 4.7.9.? I plan to add a new AD DC, version 4.11, by joining it to the domain. Can the domain function in production with three DCs on 4.7.9, and a new one running 4.11 ? Thanks,-Mike

...gt; <local> > file xfer file to <local> Process file list in file to cp files to external Just checking if there is something else I could/shuld do or something I am forgetting about. -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but why does a forklift have to be so big if all it does is lift forks?"

Dovecot version 1.0.rc26. Situation is essentially a forklift upgrade to make more horsepower available for email. Given a new mail store using Postfix and Dovecot (Maildir), is it possible to transfer from the old mail box (running the same config) or will this generate problems with the various indices maintained by Dovecot? Kind regards and thanks/ldv L...

Is there a less drastic way to upgrade a pair of dhcpd servers on Centos 5.x than forklifting the old boxes out and hoping the replacements work?. The failover protocol seems to be incompatible so I just upgrade one at a time.... Has anyone been through this with a clever solution - like compiling a new dhcpd on the old boxes for an easy rollback? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesel...

Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,

I am forklifting a Merridian option 51c with 112 Nortel Digital Handsets and 400 analog units. For the analog units I have quotes for 9 ADIT 600 48 port fxs units and 17 Rhino 24 port FXS channel banks. I have used neither. Which is the best choice? The price difference is not that great. I am looking at...

Looks like we will be forced to make a move on our voicemail system as Nortel has declared Meridian Mail an end of life product. Frustrating thing is that it would seem their only reason for it is so they can force our hand to move to Call Pilot. Is there any documentation and feedback out there of how people have used Asterisk as a voicemail system for a legacy PBX? We've got about